Yeah, Aaron, I caught how the headline said “linked” and the article said “may.”
There has been so much conflicting information about this massacre. I admit that I’ve never bought the robbery theory. Who would rob a Lane Bryant in Tinley Park shortly after the store opens on a Saturday morning? The pickings aren’t going to be very good! I’ve been saying since this story broke that one of the victims knew the killer. That’s the only thing that makes any sense.
The first reports — including the subject of this thread — said there was a security camera and that the killer was a convicted felon. “Police said that security cameras in the store had allowed them to tentatively identify the man, who is understood to have a history of armed robbery and a murder conviction.” Initial reports also said that there were four dead and one wounded.
Now police are saying that the investigation is “sensitive” and “confidential.” I think they know who did it. More than 48 hours have past, there’s a survivor, and we’ve yet to get more than a vague description of the killer. Where’s the composite sketch? Why the secrecy when a killer is at large?
Sorry if I sound so frustrated.
Press conference coming up shortly. Dunno if Fox will carry it.