Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Moussaoui Judge: Terror Trials Work
AP via SFGate ^ | 2/1/8 | MATTHEW BARAKAT, Associated Press Writer

Posted on 02/01/2008 3:36:24 PM PST by SmithL

The judge who presided over Zacarias Moussaoui's trial questioned the government's decision to seek a death sentence against the Sept. 11 conspirator, and offered a strong defense of federal courts' ability to handle terror trials.

U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema said in a speech Friday at the American University law school that the government's decision to seek a death sentence against Moussaoui appeared to be politically motivated, and that the zealous pursuit of a death sentence opened up numerous issues of exposing classified information that otherwise could have been avoided.

"The war on terror is an important piece of political leverage," Brinkema said. "Don't lose sight of the political realities."

Because the trial was a capital case, Moussaoui was allowed access to a wide array of evidence that would have been irrelevant in a non-capital case, including statements from captured al-Qaida leaders that Moussaoui was at best a bit player in their plans.

The court struggled for nearly two years in trying to balance Moussaoui's right to have access to those witnesses with the government's right to continue its ongoing interrogations of those witnesses, including Sept. 11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, without interruption. Eventually the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ordered that summaries of the men's statements be prepared for trial without allowing defense depositions.

At one point Brinkema barred the government from pursuing the death penalty as a sanction for its refusal to make key witnesses available, although an appellate court later lifted that sanction.

Moussaoui pleaded guilty in 2005 to conspiring with al-Qaida to hijack aircraft, among other crimes. In a 2006 sentencing trial, a jury concluded that Moussaoui's actions furthered the Sept. 11 plot. But the jury ultimately decided to spare his life and sentence him to life in prison.

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 911hijackers; abukhaledalsahrawi; alsahrawi; brinkema; jihadinamerica; judge; moussaoui; terror; terrortrials; zacariasmoussaoui

1 posted on 02/01/2008 3:36:27 PM PST by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Brinkema, Leonie M.
Born 1944 in Teaneck, NJ

Federal Judicial Service:
Judge, U. S. District Court, Eastern District of Virginia
Nominated by William J. Clinton on August 6, 1993, to a seat vacated by Albert V. Bryan; Confirmed by the Senate on October 18, 1993, and received commission on October 20, 1993.

U.S. Magistrate, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, 1985-1993

Education:
Rutgers University, B.A., 1966

Rutgers University, M.L.S., 1970

Cornell Law School, J.D., 1976

Professional Career:
Trial attorney, Public Integrity Section, Criminal Division, U.S. Department of Justice, 1976-1977
Assistant U.S. attorney, Eastern District of Virginia, 1977-1983
Trial attorney, Office of International Affairs, Criminal Division, U.S. Department of Justice, 1983-1984
Part-time legal instructor, Northern Virginia Criminal Justice Academy, 1984-1985
Private practice, Alexandria, Virginia, 1984-1985

Race or Ethnicity: White

Gender: Female

2 posted on 02/01/2008 3:36:51 PM PST by SmithL (My tagline dropped out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

This judge has been smoking some serious weed.

We barely got a conviction of this clown.

Should we do this 500 more times?

TruTV must be putting her up to this.


3 posted on 02/01/2008 3:38:31 PM PST by exit82 (How do you handle Hillary? You Huma her.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: exit82
I Dont say this often...or lightly...

The suggestion that we not seek to exterminate these murderous vermin from the entire planet is traitorous as it’s base value...

This illustrates why the courts should NOT be involved in matters of WAR.

The judicial...ursurping power from the executive....

4 posted on 02/01/2008 3:44:28 PM PST by Crim (Dont frak with the Zeitgeist....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
"The war on terror is an important piece of political leverage," Brinkema said. "Don't lose sight of the political realities."

Yo clown in black robes. You are supposed to be concerned with the Law, not the politics of your case.

5 posted on 02/01/2008 4:10:58 PM PST by MNJohnnie (Instead of "Swift Boaters", 2008 Democrats have "Short Bussers"-Freeper Sax)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
Gee a Clintonite Judge, approved by a McCain Senate Committee. Just what is the political difference between McCain-Clinton?
6 posted on 02/01/2008 4:12:52 PM PST by MNJohnnie (Instead of "Swift Boaters", 2008 Democrats have "Short Bussers"-Freeper Sax)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

“. . . viaSFGate”

I stopped reading there.


7 posted on 02/01/2008 4:13:39 PM PST by RinaseaofDs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RinaseaofDs
Fine, read the exact same story on Fox, then: http://www.foxnews.com/wires/2008Feb01/0,4670,JudgeTerrorism,00.html.

You do understand the SFGate is one of many sites with an AP news feed, don't you? San Francisco Chronicle had absolutely nothing to do with writing this AP story.

8 posted on 02/01/2008 4:39:23 PM PST by SmithL (My tagline dropped out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

I’ve always felt that killing these people in the field is the best option. Look at all the opposition to Gitmo. And all the expense of trying these guys.

Can you imagine the circus if we captured bin Laden?


9 posted on 02/01/2008 4:43:59 PM PST by popdonnelly (Get Reid. Salazar, and Harkin out of the Senate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

This is wartime, and they aren’t citizens. Set up military tribunals and be done with it.

People walk around acting like war has NEVER happened to us. It worked then, it will work now.

They aren’t entitled to due process under the law. They are entitled to their rights under the Geneva Convention.

AP, SF Gate, what’s the frickin’ difference.

Please.


10 posted on 02/01/2008 5:08:37 PM PST by RinaseaofDs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RinaseaofDs

So how long did it take, and how much did it cost? If we did this for every captured German in WWII the trails would still be going on. These, mostly Clintonite, affirmative action judges are a fifth column in this war.


11 posted on 02/01/2008 6:36:30 PM PST by Old North State
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson