To: Norman Bates
The scary thing about these polls is how poorly Romney does in Southern states. Imagine what that means if he's the nominee....
No Republican can win without the South.
11 posted on
02/01/2008 11:53:18 AM PST by
Antoninus
(The other guys s#ck so I'm stuck with Huck!)
To: Antoninus
This is all cherry picking.
survey usa is about as credible as fox news opinion dynamics.
19 posted on
02/01/2008 12:02:26 PM PST by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: Antoninus
Romney would have trouble winning the South even in the general. Hillary would win in a landslide.
20 posted on
02/01/2008 12:03:32 PM PST by
End Times Crusader
(John McCain - Leadership for America ; Committed to victory and 100 years in Iraq)
To: Antoninus
The scary thing about these polls is how poorly Romney does in Southern states. Imagine what that means if he's the nominee....I don't think that the polls are telling the whole story. There are a lot of good old boys in the south who wouldn't say so to a pollster but who won't vote for a Mormon. Confronted with a choice between Romney and Hillary/Obama, they just stay home or leave that line on the ballot blank. Enough that I think it would cost Romney at least three states in the old Confederacy: Florida, Missouri, Arkansas, North Carolina, or Virginia as each of these states turns more blue with each passing election.
To: Antoninus
No Republican can win without the South.Nixon did.
65 posted on
02/01/2008 9:14:06 PM PST by
Hoodat
(The whole point of the Conservative Movement is to gain converts, not demonize them.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson