Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Richard Kimball
The original Taurus was actually a half-decent car and it was cheap - became the best selling car in America for a while. The second generation wasn't bad, but it was pretty much just a reskin of the original car. The car became less and less competitive and as for the quality, it went way down hill towards the end of that generation. The third generation (which is what we 30-somethings remember driving ourselves, and loathing) was made from 96-99 and with a facelift from 00-07. That was the one that spiked the Taurus name forever; poor reliability, poor value for money, poor *everything*.

This is what they're currently telling us is a Taurus. Check out the razorblade face!


16 posted on 01/31/2008 4:55:39 PM PST by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: Spktyr

The styling on the current Taurus is insipid. The crazy thing is, companies like Toyota use California car design firms to style their cars so they look good. Who the heck is doing the styling for Ford? North Korea?


23 posted on 01/31/2008 5:21:49 PM PST by 6SJ7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson