To: Jeff Head
"...patrolled by the National Guard which would make good training for rotation to the Sand Box. That fence can then be backed up by electronic surveillance and UAVs in the air. The combination of those things in depth..." Just a nitpick, but redundancy or double/triple checks on a front line do not qualify as a defense in depth. A rearward fence or moat...an auxilary mobile force in the rear...that would qualify as defense in depth.
40 posted on
01/31/2008 1:20:49 PM PST by
Southack
(Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
To: Southack
Electronics monitoring approach to fence...fence...road...fence...electronics monitoring 100 yards inside US border...and UAVs overhead would be a barrier in depth in my view.
45 posted on
01/31/2008 1:26:39 PM PST by
Jeff Head
(Freedom is not free...never has been, never will be. (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson