Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: americanophile; DoughtyOne

The marriage license form change was part of the implementation of the court order that the Mass marriage law should be read as “person 1 and person 2”, rather than “man and woman”.

I suppose one could argue that, even though the court required the state to marry same-sex couples, we should still stick it to them by making one of them identify themselves as the “wife”, but that’s rather childish.

However, if I had been in charge, I would have offered two forms, so those who wanted could use “husband and wife”.

Of course, for all I know that’s how it really is, because without a link I don’t know what the truth is.


366 posted on 01/31/2008 1:53:19 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies ]


To: CharlesWayneCT

Charles, up the thread I posted a link to an article that made it clear to me that Romney took actions the court declared it had no power to demand.

It more or less becomes pointless to discuss these matters if folks dismiss the things we do link.

You are moved to support Romney. I am not, and won’t.

You take care. I honestly don’t have any more time to address this right now.


371 posted on 01/31/2008 1:59:20 PM PST by DoughtyOne (PARTY WANTED: Full Time, Cons exp a must. Refs 20 yrs. No Amnesty sptrs. 1 vote per 4 yrs negotiable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 366 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson