It takes a man that doesn’t have Romney’s history. That’s all.
You mean a history like when he vetoed in-state tuition for illegals, pushed for a marriage amendment in Massachusetts, opposed drivers licenses and benefits to illegals? Cut taxes and balanced the budget? That history?
Or just that he used to be pro-choice, just as Reagan and both Bushes were?
History does not have to repeat itself, and people change. You would throw away a gamble in exchange for a sure loss?
It’s like people are being handed a 50-dollar casino coin, and told they can put it in the slot machine if they want. And some people are saying, “Well, there’s a good chance I’ll lose if I put it in the machine, so here, have it back”.