Posted on 01/31/2008 9:29:21 AM PST by APRPEH
January 29, 2008 (Computerworld) A popular urban legend debunking site has stopped serving up adware downloads after the practice was criticized by security experts and users, according to one researcher.
Snopes.com, a site that exposes urban legends, had until yesterday been funding its operation in part with revenues from a pop-up ad that posed the question "Do you want to block Junk emails?" That pop-up, said Alex Eckelberry, CEO of Sunbelt Software, in turn shilled ad-serving software from Zango Inc., a well-known adware distributor that settled with the U.S. Federal Trade Commission in late 2006 over charges it used unfair and deceptive practices to download software to users' PCs.
Eckelberry said he had seen the pop-up on Snopes for more than a year, and had first complained to the site -- which is run by Barbara and David Mikkelson -- six months ago. He did not receive a response at the time, Eckelberry said in a post to his company blog yesterday.
"Snopes is getting paid well for these pop-ups (either pay-per-click or by page views)," he charged Monday. "Advertisers like Zango don't pay to run ads that don't get a good response. And likewise, a site like Snopes won't waste valuable ad inventory on poorly-paying ads. And I firmly believe that the fact that the ads do well is because of Snopes' credibility."
Eckelberry's revelation gained traction when his blog was cited on Slashdot, the online tech news aggregation site.
Commenters reading his blog generally gave Snopes poor marks for how it was earning revenue. "I like Snopes, but I've largely given up visiting their site because of all the pop-up ads," said someone identified only as Steve. "The particular ad choices they've made have driven at least me away."
But some took Eckelberry to task. "Heaven forbid a site make[s] money," countered a commenter dubbed Anonymous.
By Tuesday, Snopes.com had apparently pulled the Zango pop-up, Eckelberry reported. "This seems to have changed yesterday evening," he said in an update to his original post. "The last time I confirmed the pop-up was at about 4 p.m. EST yesterday."
Eckelberry also responded to commenters who had argued that Snopes, like any site, had a right to monetize its content. "I have no problem with sites using advertising to pay their bills," explained Eckelberry. "[But] I do have a problem with a site consistently pushing one particular pop-up that pushes adware. It's not like this pop-up was occurring on some limited basis, or part of a series of ads. This was a consistent campaign that showed up regularly, for a long time."
Representatives from Snopes.com did not respond to several questions posed via e-mail, or to a message left at the phone number listed in the site's domain registration record.
You think regular Snopes readers would be smart enough not to click on that kind of thing. OTOH, the kind of people who are usually referred to Snopes are exactly the type who would click on that thing.
Where do we go to find out if this is actually true?
A popup isn’t adware. And if anyone is stupid enough to fall for it, then they would probably just pick up adware wherever they went.
May I use this opportunity to recommend AdMuncher? It eliminates almost all the advertising on the internet, banners and popups or popunders, so you don’t even know it’s there. It’s shareware, so you pay a bit for it, but it’s one of the best programs I have ever used, and it actually helps bandwidth, because you don’t download the advertising visuals. Murray Hurps, the New Zealander who does it, is a great guy, IMHO.
Disclosure: I have no financial interest in AdMuncher.
Sounds like an Urban Legend.
I believe the point was that the pop up was advertising “how to prevent junk email”. It is a classic setup. A trusted site and a message which plays on the trust, together, a dangerous combination.
Winner, winner...chicken dinner!
You're right, but this is a pop up which is a bit more insidious than just a link on their main page.
That wasn't me. I opted to be a smart aleck instead of adding anything substantive.
Opps!! Sorry!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.