Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Stoat

That’ll never work. Who are women going to take to court to get them to support them and the baby?

Have they got a DNA answer for that one?


38 posted on 01/30/2008 10:43:40 PM PST by DoughtyOne (PARTY WANTED: Full Time, Proven Cons exp a must. Refs going bk 20 yrs. Amnesty sptrs need not apply.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: DoughtyOne
That’ll never work. Who are women going to take to court to get them to support them and the baby?

Have they got a DNA answer for that one?

You are asking clear, reasonable, coherent and entirely relevant and logical questions.

The penalty for doing so will be assessed under Hate Speech statutes.

I assume that you have legal representation?

 Major Hochstetter

42 posted on 01/30/2008 10:55:47 PM PST by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2012: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: DoughtyOne
That’ll never work. Who are women going to take to court to get them to support them and the baby?

You are years out of date on your understanding of child support law. Due to federal "welfare" reform, fathers can be arbitrarily appointed - even if they've never even met the mother - and forced to pay child support for life - even with a DNA test proving they are not the fathers. I'm not kidding. The issue has been discussed more in California newspapers than anywhere else in the country, but it's also discussed some other places.

Injustice by Default

Congress Supports Deadbeat Dads and Loose Women
54 posted on 01/31/2008 2:50:57 AM PST by RogerFGay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson