Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dick Morris: "Kennedy Says No to Clinton Dirty Politics"
NewsMax.com ^ | 29 Jan 08 | Dick Morris & Eileen McGann

Posted on 01/29/2008 11:58:50 AM PST by seanmerc

What does Ted Kennedy’s endorsement of Barack Obama really mean?

In addition to seriously boosting Obama’s chances for the Democratic nomination by anointing him as the generational heir to John F. Kennedy, there’s something else that’s just as important for the body politic: Ted Kennedy, Barack Obama, and the voters of South Carolina may have personally tolled the death knell for the Clintons’ reprehensible politics of personal destruction.

It’s about time.

For more than 30 years, no one has been able to stop Bill and Hillary Clinton from routinely acting on their shared base instinct: to annihilate anyone who gets in their way, in whatever way it takes, however long it takes, whatever it costs, and then to enjoy watching their targets suffer.

Throughout their long public careers, they’ve had no moral overseers, no one to challenge them. The sycophants surrounding them simply implement their orders, never questioning them. So after successfully employing their slash and burn tactics for years, they’ve come to truly believe that their reprehensible politics are justified, even necessary.

Remember Hillary’s glee when she announced that the “fun part” of the campaign was about to begin — her attacks on her fellow Democrats? She was serious.

The Clintons have repeatedly and successfully embraced the politics of personal destruction — and enjoyed every minute of it.

In Washington, Arkansas, and recently in South Carolina, they’ve used whatever slimy tactics they felt they needed, ruining reputations, invading the privacy of their targets by dispatching private detectives to comb their records and troll through their trash, lying about their opponents, blackmailing and threatening women who dared to say yes — or even no — to Bill Clinton, releasing confidential employment records.

Remember how the Clintonites released Linda Tripp’s confidential employment files to Jane Mayer of The New Yorker after Clinton hit man Harold Ickes met with Tripp’s boss?

Years later, the Department of Defense settled a lawsuit with Tripp for over $600,000 for invading her privacy. And then there were the stories branding Monica Lewinsky as a stalker who was trying to hurt the president.

Those were traced back to Sidney Blumenethal, a Clinton White House adviser, and the author of the right-wing conspiracy theory that Hillary so loves. Of course, then it turned out that this stalker had been called by the president from the White House hundreds of time and invited into the Oval Office for sex in the private kitchen.

Then there was Gennifer Flowers, smeared by George Stephanopoulos and James Carville as a liar and opportunist. Eventually, Bill Clinton admitted under oath that he, in fact, had a sexual relationship with Flowers. On it goes. And none of these folks have ever apologized for their as the brass knuckles enforcers of the Clintons.

Throughout the recent primaries, Bill Clinton has been Hillary’s hit man, especially in South Carolina where he was in charge of branding Obama as the "black candidate." Shamelessly distorting Obama’s words and deliberately using the race card to try and marginalize the first serious African-American candidate for president, Bill Clinton worked overtime at stirring dissension.

It’s been revolting. And it seemed that no one could stop them.

Until Barack Obama. Until Ted Kennedy. Until South Carolina. Until the voters said enough.

Now the voters of South Carolina and the Kennedys have stepped forward and openly challenged the tawdry Clinton politics of personal destruction, their hit job on Obama, their use of the race card, their claims of dynastic privilege.

On Saturday, 55 percent of the South Carolina voters said no to the Clintons. After listening to the two of them disparage Obama, distort his record, dis his hopes and dreams for America, South Carolina backed Obama and his politics of hope. And Ted Kennedy, in his lofty endorsement of Obama, served notice on the Clintons that the days of their politics of personal destruction are over.

Apparently Sen. Kennedy called the Clintons last week and demanded an immediate end to their transparent racial politics and attempts to destroy Obama. They ignored him.

After the polls closed, Bill Clinton’s surly and irrelevant reference to Jesse Jackson’s showing in South Carolina 20 years ago was meant to diminish Obama’s victory. But the press and the public — and apparently Sen. Kennedy — caught the unattractive performance on YouTube.

Now, for once, someone has challenged the Clintons’ dirty, outdated, and unacceptable politics.

Ted Kennedy has made it clear that the Democratic Party and the voters of America are no longer going to tolerate and ignore the Clintons sordid personal politics.

Bravo!


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: barackhusseinobama; clinton; clintonistas; clintoon; dickmorris; herroyalhighness; hildebeast; hillary; hillaryrodhamclinton; morris; mrsbillclinton; obama; stophillary; tedkennedy; toesucker
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last
To: 668 - Neighbor of the Beast

“That’s all very well but it bares a mouthful of fangs to the Republican nominee, who will know that anything he says about Obama will be interpreted as a new low in racist ranting.
If Obama is the nominee, I predict the GOP opponent will be urged to “step down” over some innocuous remark. (Anything will suffice.) And if I know Republicans he probably will step down. :(”

That is why a lot of us are praying for Hillary to win, and hoping for those that are pulling for her to lose will get a clue.

The last thing we need is a Dem nominee or heaven forbid, a president, that will have a Praetorian guard that will use the race card 24/7 to stop any criticism or dissent directed at him.


21 posted on 01/29/2008 12:18:37 PM PST by VanDeKoik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom

“Ted Kennedy has made it clear that the Democratic Party and the voters of America are no longer going to tolerate and ignore the Clintons sordid personal politics.”

And why does he think that? Hasn’t the Dem Party tolerated Ted’s own sordid personal life and politics for years?


22 posted on 01/29/2008 12:19:36 PM PST by Melinda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: 668 - Neighbor of the Beast

Morris ought to know them - he helped them to gain their political power, didn’t he?


23 posted on 01/29/2008 12:19:43 PM PST by LucyJo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: seanmerc
Ted Kennedy, Barack Obama, and the voters of South Carolina may have personally tolled the death knell for the Clintons’ reprehensible politics of personal destruction.

Now that Dick Morris says it is so, you can be 100% certain that it isn't so. Hillary will win the nomination in a cakewalk. Take it to the bank.

24 posted on 01/29/2008 12:20:27 PM PST by WhistlingPastTheGraveyard (John McCain: Bush Derangement Syndrome's "Patient Zero")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seanmerc

Dick...Kennedy, the Washington democrat elites, and democrat voters of South Carolina have NOT spoken out against the politics of personal destruction....

....they have only spoken out against the use of same against DEMOCRATS...as long as the targets are republicans the scorch and burn tactics will be perfectly acceptable.


25 posted on 01/29/2008 12:21:39 PM PST by Moby Grape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Melinda
Way too many people are burying the Clintons. One of Obama's contributors out of Chicago just got indicted. If a scandal just happens to turn up that takes Obama out of the race, Hillary is in like Flynn.

I was watching one of those focus groups on Fox, and it was an Obama group. Without exception, every one said that IF Hillary ended up being the candidate, they would enthusiastically support her. She is not dead. She's wounded, but she is not dead. People need to quit dancing and put a stake through that vampire's heart. Heck, I'm thinking about registering as a Democrat and voting for Obama in the primary.

26 posted on 01/29/2008 12:21:40 PM PST by Richard Kimball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: seanmerc


RAMÓN ROJO: I've decided to hang my gun up on the wall.

DON MIGUEL: I think that Ramón has the right idea. I, too, am getting tired of these killings. They must stop.



27 posted on 01/29/2008 12:23:57 PM PST by macamadamia ("The best lack all conviction, while the worst are full of passionate intensity." Yeats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seanmerc

Well, bless the Cliintons’ little ole flea-bitten hearts.


28 posted on 01/29/2008 12:25:05 PM PST by hoe_cake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: angcat

how old


29 posted on 01/29/2008 12:25:53 PM PST by PjhCPA (catchy taglines are boring)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: seanmerc

Dick, Ted is about 16 years late!


30 posted on 01/29/2008 12:26:52 PM PST by MIchaelTArchangel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seanmerc

Ted Kennedy had no problem with the politics of personal destruction when it involved Clarence Thomas.


31 posted on 01/29/2008 12:27:37 PM PST by Moby Grape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Richard Kimball
Morris was all over the Clintons’ strategy of making a deliberate racial divide in the race last week. Was this just Morris’ OWN strategy to use the media to publicly deep-six Hillary as payback? It’s better than chess!
32 posted on 01/29/2008 12:31:24 PM PST by Melinda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: seanmerc

If the dirty politics doesn’t have the Kennedy(tm) label on it, old Teddy wants nothing to do with it.


33 posted on 01/29/2008 12:33:34 PM PST by keepitreal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seanmerc

Just ask Clarence Thomas about Ted Kennedy’s noble concern about the politics of personal destruction.


34 posted on 01/29/2008 12:35:21 PM PST by Moby Grape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A. Morgan

Clinton/Kennedy Fatigue!


35 posted on 01/29/2008 12:37:58 PM PST by A. Morgan (VOTE McCain n' WE'LL BE UP TO OUR NECKS IN ILLEGALS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: seanmerc

Morris’s articles only says exactly what we’ve been saying for 16 years.

But it only took a Black candidate whose hidden name is Hussein, a drunken Senator who’s antics killed Mary Jo, and a state that is being boycotted by the NAACP.

BEAM ME UP!!!!!!!!! PLEASE (<—jailed congressmen with bad hair, quote)


36 posted on 01/29/2008 12:38:36 PM PST by JoeSixPack1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seanmerc
Lil’ Dickey put down the crack pipe and step away from the keyboard. You are irrelevant and now have wandered into delusional. This was all orchestrated by the Clinton’s to make her look more centralist. Teddy hurts candidates outside of Mass and Berkeley. It will hurt Obama.
37 posted on 01/29/2008 12:44:37 PM PST by mad_as_he$$ (Stop the unFair Tax now; before it is fair for your neighbor and not you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VanDeKoik
If they inherited the governing style of JFK... dims would fit in with the style of a modern centrist Republican with a few Conservative ideologies under his belt. Darn that sounds familiar (somewhat like Bush)... but JFK had weaknesses that ‘toon just tries to emulate... the entire kennedy clan suffers from these weaknesses. So all in all... with all of JFK warts... today’s dims don’t rise even close to that level of competence. I think that they “imagine” that it has some mystical meaning, but then the Camelot that ted loves to rant about was completely a fantasy world that never existed.

LLS
38 posted on 01/29/2008 12:45:04 PM PST by LibLieSlayer (Support America, Kill terrorists, Destroy dims and vote for?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: seanmerc

Personally, I think he endorsed BHO, because he recognizes an empty suit when he sees one. A whole lot easier to control the over-his-head empty suit, than the hil and bill show. It’s all about Kennedy keeping power. He has a much better chance of being a mover and shaker in BHO’s administration, than in a clintoon admin.

Just my take on it.


39 posted on 01/29/2008 12:49:24 PM PST by Hoffer Rand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seanmerc

“There but for fortune.” If not for his untimely demise, it would be JFK Jr. running for president today, as the junior senator from NY.
Hillary, of course, would be a senator in some other state, struggling to destroy him in order to win the nomination.


40 posted on 01/29/2008 12:50:40 PM PST by 668 - Neighbor of the Beast (Just - my - humble - opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson