Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New York NOW Chapter SLAMS Ted Kennedy for endorsing Hillary's opponent
Times Union ^ | 01/28/2008

Posted on 01/28/2008 10:55:17 AM PST by 1Old Pro

The National Organization for Women’s New York chapter issued a scathing reaction to Sen. Ted Kennedy’s endorsement of Barack Obama over Hillary Clinton. Actually, the word “scathing” feels inadequate here.

Read for yourself:

“Women have just experienced the ultimate betrayal. Senator Kennedy’s endorsement of Hillary Clinton’s opponent in the Democratic presidential primary campaign has really hit women hard. Women have forgiven Kennedy, stuck up for him, stood by him, hushed the fact that he was late in his support of Title IX, the ERA, the Family Leave and Medical Act to name a few. Women have buried their anger that his support for the compromises in No Child Left Behind and the Medicare bogus drug benefit brought us the passage of these flawed bills. We have thanked him for his ardent support of many civil rights bills, BUT women are always waiting in the wings.

“And now the greatest betrayal! We are repaid with his abandonment! He’s picked the new guy over us. He’s joined the list of progressive white men who can’t or won’t handle the prospect of a woman president who is Hillary Clinton (they will of course say they support a woman president, just not “this” one). ‘They’ are Howard Dean and Jim Dean (Yup! That’s Howard’s brother) who run DFA (that’s the group and list from the Dean campaign that we women helped start and grow). They are Alternet, Progressive Democrats of America, democrats.com, Kucinich lovers and all the other groups that take women’s money, say they’ll do feminist and women’s rights issues one of these days, and conveniently forget to mention women and children when they talk about poverty or human needs or America’s future or whatever.

“This latest move by Kennedy, is so telling about the status of and respect for women’s rights, women’s voices, women’s equality, women’s authority and our ability – indeed, our obligation - to promote and earn and deserve and elect, unabashedly, a President that is the first woman after centuries of men who ‘know what’s best for us.’”


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: donnybrook; feminazis; hahahaha; hillary; impeachedpresident; impeachment; kennedy; lesbians4hillary; nags; nowgang; obama; schadenfreude; serialrapist; tedkennedy; theswimmer
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-198 next last
To: edcoil
I figured scrappleface.

This is funny, libs showing their colors, hypocrisy, and true motivations.

41 posted on 01/28/2008 11:12:35 AM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

MEOW!!!


42 posted on 01/28/2008 11:12:46 AM PST by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

This is hilarious! A perfect illustration of how NOW has been rendered useless by their own polarizing, philandering, “Bull Connor” Clintons.


43 posted on 01/28/2008 11:12:51 AM PST by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AD from SpringBay

That’s the greatest hypocrisy of all, considering that Hildebeest was in charge of degrading and smearing women who had the temerity to tell the truth about the slime she married.

The NAGS should be ashamed of themselves.


44 posted on 01/28/2008 11:13:28 AM PST by Right Cal Gal (Remember Billy Dale!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: All

Paybacks for John Kennedy Jr.s plane crash...

Hillary wanted the Senate Seat in New York
and Handsome Future Son just had to die.

GO GET HER, TED!!!!!


45 posted on 01/28/2008 11:13:31 AM PST by reformjoy ( Elect Hillary -- Destroy a Nation!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
This campaign, for all its shallowness and tediousness, is actually performing at least one valuable task for the Republic: demonstrating in the clearest possible manner the inherent structural racism of the 'Rat party.

There will, of course, be numerous folks who will still be purblind to this institutional trait of that party. These individuals are likely those who employ one-value logic and/or still believe in a flat earth and/or the Big Rock Candy Mountain, and are thus beyond help in any case.

46 posted on 01/28/2008 11:13:48 AM PST by SAJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

NOW, you idiots. How someone personally treats women tells buckets about what he really thinks of them.

Get real.


47 posted on 01/28/2008 11:13:52 AM PST by A_Former_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

Seriously: is this real?


48 posted on 01/28/2008 11:13:58 AM PST by Petronski (I didn't leave the GOP. The GOP left me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

49 posted on 01/28/2008 11:14:00 AM PST by Sender (I've been chicken franchised.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Right Cal Gal
The NAGS should be ashamed of themselves.

They have no shame, just fellow fugly girlfriends.

50 posted on 01/28/2008 11:14:35 AM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

These old broads ought to get over themselves.


51 posted on 01/28/2008 11:14:46 AM PST by EEDUDE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

The old nags up in arms. They don’t even understand they all all washed up along with their lesbo Hillary.


52 posted on 01/28/2008 11:15:00 AM PST by dforest (Don't even ask me to vote for McCain, Rudy, or Huckster.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

If you don’t support Hillary you’re a sexist, and if you don’t support Obama you’re a racist. Tough decision for a Democrat. Poor Edwards doesn’t even qualify for affirmative action.


53 posted on 01/28/2008 11:15:22 AM PST by Telepathic Intruder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro
Welcome in all to the house of the Liberals.
54 posted on 01/28/2008 11:15:40 AM PST by tflabo (Truth or tyranny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indylindy
The old nags up in arms

Hairy underarms

55 posted on 01/28/2008 11:15:51 AM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Telepathic Intruder
Poor Edwards doesn’t even qualify for affirmative action.

If you don't suppor edwards your a metrosexualaphobe

56 posted on 01/28/2008 11:17:17 AM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

This is an instant classic: a borderline psychopathic rant from the Medusa Wing of the Democratic party, for whom not even Ted Kennedy’s ideological grace is pure enough to cleanse the bile from their gullets. These are not well women, these NOW-folk; they have gorged themselves on a diet of perpetual anger for so long they can no longer find solace in any person or place. Would Obama not give them 95% of what they seek, politically speaking? Of course, but he is a “he” and presumptively would not be comfortable with NOW’s plans for a Lesbian Reich.


57 posted on 01/28/2008 11:19:44 AM PST by andy58-in-nh (Kill the terrorists, secure the borders, and give me back my freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

I love seeing the dems attack each other. The Clinton machine trying to steamroll the competition.


58 posted on 01/28/2008 11:20:21 AM PST by Blue Highway (The only cure for RINOvirus - Fred Thompson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro
Hey NOW....50+ million of these had their votes disenfranchised by your ilk.
59 posted on 01/28/2008 11:20:36 AM PST by tflabo (Truth or tyranny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: andy58-in-nh

It’s not that Obama won’t support 99% of their wants, it’s that they like to vote for someone who “looks like them”.


60 posted on 01/28/2008 11:21:09 AM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-198 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson