Skip to comments.
Fred lawyers flock to Romney
Boston Globe / Political Intelligence ^
| 1-25-08
| Charlie Savage
Posted on 01/27/2008 11:15:55 AM PST by SeafoodGumbo
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-75 next last
To: SeafoodGumbo
Well, my support, all of my one vote, is now going to Romney. I think he’s our best shot.
2
posted on
01/27/2008 11:18:00 AM PST
by
Aria
(NO RAPIST ENABLER FOR PRESIDENT!!!)
To: SeafoodGumbo
Fred Thompson for Attorney General!
3
posted on
01/27/2008 11:18:37 AM PST
by
counterpunch
(Mike Huckabee — The Religious Wrong)
To: counterpunch
4
posted on
01/27/2008 11:19:20 AM PST
by
SatinDoll
(Fredhead and proud of it!)
To: SeafoodGumbo
Could it be principle that are driving the Lawyers to Mitt? Nah, it’s the billable hours.
5
posted on
01/27/2008 11:22:50 AM PST
by
lmc12
To: lmc12
Could it be principle that are driving the Lawyers to Mitt? Nah, its the billable hours.
Are you brand new to politics or just dense as a brick.
These people are supporting Mitt, not working for him.
You think he campaigned for a over a year without lawyers?
6
posted on
01/27/2008 11:26:59 AM PST
by
elizabetty
("Nothing great was ever achieved without enthusiasm." .Ralph Waldo Emerson)
To: elizabetty
Lawyers are often motivated by principle and loyalty to ideas, they never ever expect anything in return.Do they?
7
posted on
01/27/2008 11:30:54 AM PST
by
lmc12
To: SeafoodGumbo
Lawyers do love liberals..especially ones who can't decide on their positions without consulting polls and lawyers. Kind of reminds me of one William Jefferson Clinton.
U.S. Army Retired |
8
posted on
01/27/2008 11:33:18 AM PST
by
big'ol_freeper
(REAGAN: "..party..must represent certain fundamental beliefs [not] compromised..[for] expediency")
To: lmc12
Mitt is the closest to Fred on issues.
Simple as that.
9
posted on
01/27/2008 11:33:23 AM PST
by
JaneNC
(I)
To: lmc12
We all expect something in return....like a decent country..one that isn’t pulled further down in to the muck by another Clinton. Even lawyers can think that.
10
posted on
01/27/2008 11:34:13 AM PST
by
Aria
(NO RAPIST ENABLER FOR PRESIDENT!!!)
To: JaneNC
I don’t trust anybody that dyes their eyebrows.
11
posted on
01/27/2008 11:36:09 AM PST
by
lmc12
To: SeafoodGumbo
Give Fred the VP slot, Mitt, or I’m staying home.
You need a southerner, and no, Arkansas doesn’t count.
To: counterpunch
That, is a more meaningful post than VP.
Good call
13
posted on
01/27/2008 11:39:13 AM PST
by
mylife
(The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
To: counterpunch
Don’t have a problem with that, though sometimes I fantasize about bringing John Ashcroft back.
14
posted on
01/27/2008 11:39:13 AM PST
by
Terpfen
(It's your fault, not Pelosi's.)
To: SeafoodGumbo
Oh good, flocking lawyers! Just what we need!
15
posted on
01/27/2008 11:40:08 AM PST
by
Jagman
(Lapdogs rule!)
To: Aria
Every vote counts and it looks like Mitt is starting to pile them up. I’m hoping the country will rally around him now and then he will have more time to get prepared nationaly for the campaign against the democrat machine.
16
posted on
01/27/2008 11:46:53 AM PST
by
TheLion
To: elizabetty
17
posted on
01/27/2008 11:47:20 AM PST
by
malia
( Fred Thompson, you stay in there. I know you can do it!!! Prayers are said for your mother.)
To: Terpfen
Dont have a problem with that, though sometimes I fantasize about bringing John Ashcroft back.
I'm sure the Democrats would love to run against a GOP nominee who said he would appoint Ashcroft again.
They would wake up every day thinking it's Christmas.
18
posted on
01/27/2008 11:49:31 AM PST
by
counterpunch
(Mike Huckabee — The Religious Wrong)
To: SeafoodGumbo; All
someone here on FR posted there was a CNN crawl indicating Thompson was going to endorse Romney.
CAN ANYONE confirm this?
nothing on cnn.com or fnc or ap or reuters.
this would be a HOT story.
more relevant that crist’s mccain epiphany
19
posted on
01/27/2008 11:51:00 AM PST
by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: counterpunch
Oh, I know that. He’s politically radioactive. But what a run he had.
20
posted on
01/27/2008 11:51:09 AM PST
by
Terpfen
(It's your fault, not Pelosi's.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-75 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson