Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lonesome in Massachussets
I think they are suggesting retiring that word as a matter of etiquette, not by law.

I agree, and maybe this is a way for people to get back to a more mannered time. Sort of a reverse PC act. You can not dictate morals or etiquette, but what you can do is say "we" will recognise this as an offensive word and "choose" not to use it.

My only problem though is liberals try to do this same thing with other "words," which they deem offensive. PC is a direct avenue to the abridgement of free speech. You have to tread very lightly with this issue.

31 posted on 01/27/2008 5:33:05 AM PST by sirchtruth (No one has the RIGHT not to be offended...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: sirchtruth
My only problem though is liberals try to do this same thing with other "words," which they deem offensive. PC is a direct avenue to the abridgement of free speech. You have to tread very lightly with this issue.

It is little more than an attempt to create control by intimidation. Ban this, ban that, yada yada yada. Then they can accuse the opposition of hate speech, etc. They get to play their various social-conscience cards (race, ethnic, gender, age, etc.).

It is much more than dis-using a certain word. It is a method of control by intimidation.

Watch the similar methods being used against sports teams that use Native American tribal names, etc..
35 posted on 01/27/2008 5:49:44 AM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson