The crap position is not that Drudge did it. It’s that one would find a conclusive link that Clinton DID know the guy in the picture and WAS familiar with him based solely on that.
That’s crap.
It proves only that Clinton had a picture taken. It doesn’t even prove that Clinton knows the guy’s name.
But, hey, it is funny. I agree with that. But to try to take it further and claim Clinton lied? C’mon. Get real. Attack on the issues. Don’t go running with this crap.
Have a nice weekend.
Purposely ignoring an established behavioral pattern - Clinton’s convenient memory lapses - and using an at hominem attack on a third party in an attempt to deflect the readers mind FROM that established behavioral problem as evidenced by the PHOTOS ON THIS THREAD is crap.
So he must have been introduced as the slum lord?
It’s just COMICAL as all get out that they use the guy’s name to attempt to smear OBAMA, and then they show up in a photograph with the guy. It’s sort of like accusing Obama of playing with doo-doo and then getting caught with some dried on their own hands. The Clintons are a laugh a minute, and it would be Hillarious to hear Rush’s monologue every day with her in the Oval Office, if it wasn’t a tragedy in the making for this country.