Latest OVERALL Presidential Candidate Ratings On IMMIGRATION
How Good Are The Promises of Each Candidate to PROTECT Workers, Communities and Taxpayers FROM OVER-IMMIGRATION?
(SEE TEXT TO LEFT AND BELOW FOR HOW POINTS WERE ASSIGNED ON 36-POINT SCALE ... NumbersUSA does NOT endorse candidates.)
http://www.betterimmigration.com/candidates/2006/prez2008.html
EXCELLENT
# None
VERY GOOD
# Mitt Romney
(28 points)
GOOD
# RON PAUL
(24 points)
# MIKE HUCKABEE
(24 points)
POOR
# RUDY GIULIANI
(7 points)
BAD
# JOHN McCAIN
(5 points)
# JOHN EDWARDS
(5 points)
# HILLARY CLINTON
(4 points)
# BARACK OBAMA
(4 points)
Please note that our ratings do NOT amount to endorsements. Nor do they convey anything about the character, the strength or any other positions about the candidates. We know that every one of these candidates has supporters among the users of NumbersUSA for a lot of different reasons.
Here’s the list of 15 questions from Sessions.
LOL. Hillary and Obama get 4 points for saying they will “secure the border,” even though, as we have seen, that statement by itself means nothing whatsoever. McCain might be more dangerous than the Dems on immigration, because they might chicken out if they run into political difficulties, but McCain seems more determined.