Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

THREE SHIPS COLLIDE IN NEWARK BAY, NEAR NEW YORK CITY -- CNN
Reuters ^ | January 24, 2007

Posted on 01/24/2008 2:48:25 PM PST by HAL9000

THREE SHIPS COLLIDE IN NEWARK BAY, NEAR NEW YORK CITY -- CNN

(Excerpt) Read more at alertnet.org ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: New Jersey; US: New York
KEYWORDS: maritime; newarkbay
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-107 next last
To: Salamander

Thanks for playing!


81 posted on 01/25/2008 1:56:16 AM PST by B-Chan (Catholic. Monarchist. Texan. Any questions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
3 is an odd number.

Also a prime number.

82 posted on 01/25/2008 2:04:48 AM PST by ReignOfError
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: B-Chan

Well, ya know....the show must go on.

;-D


83 posted on 01/25/2008 2:27:52 AM PST by Salamander (And don't forget my Dog; fixed and consequent.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: LilAngel

All odd numbers are prime. Proof by exhaustion: 3, 5, 7... all. (Ok, so I’m an engineer not a mathematician.)


84 posted on 01/25/2008 2:36:23 AM PST by Lonesome in Massachussets (Being an idealist excuses nothing. Hitler was an idealist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets

Oh dear. that explains a lot.

Let me ask you something. When engineers “improve” an intersection, taking it from congested to dangerous, do they understand what they’re doing? When they bank a curve in the wrong direction, and cars slide off the edge, are the engineers keeping count, and laughing?


85 posted on 01/25/2008 4:20:16 AM PST by LilAngel (FReeping on a cell phone is like making Christmas dinner in an Easy Bake Oven)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: LilAngel

If I’d been a physicist I would have said: Proof by exhaustion, 3,5,7,[ 9 excluded as experimental error], 11, 13, ... all, with 99 percent confidence.

If I’d been a mathematician I would have said: First we need to define a field, the set of positive numbers, which is closed over the operation of multiplication. Next, we need to define a test for prime. Since our test will contain the operation of factorization we will need to define the operation... Excuse me, what was the question, again?


86 posted on 01/25/2008 4:41:09 AM PST by Lonesome in Massachussets (Being an idealist excuses nothing. Hitler was an idealist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Sudetenland; Ed Condon

No, one isn’t prime, by definition of prime numbers. The prime number theorem asserts that prime factorization is unique. Wouldn’t be true, since you add as many factors of one (one to N) as you like.

I know you were kidding, but even numbers greater than 2 cannot, by definition, be prime. Prime numbers are integers greater than one that can only be evenly divided by the integers one and itself. Even numbers are, by definition, are integer multiples of 2. The only multiple of 2 which is only divisible by two and itself is, 2.


87 posted on 01/25/2008 4:52:45 AM PST by Lonesome in Massachussets (Being an idealist excuses nothing. Hitler was an idealist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: LilAngel; Sudetenland; Ed Condon

Can you prove (without looking on the web) that there is no last prime number? Euclid had a very simply proof, which I discovered on my own when I was in grammar school.


88 posted on 01/25/2008 4:55:02 AM PST by Lonesome in Massachussets (Being an idealist excuses nothing. Hitler was an idealist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: NautiNurse

I was thinking harbor pilot.


89 posted on 01/25/2008 4:55:39 AM PST by Lonesome in Massachussets (Being an idealist excuses nothing. Hitler was an idealist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Doohickey

More of an allision, actually.


90 posted on 01/25/2008 5:00:25 AM PST by Lonesome in Massachussets (Being an idealist excuses nothing. Hitler was an idealist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Pining_4_TX
Pining for the Nobel laureate in lit. are we?

vaudine

91 posted on 01/25/2008 5:04:39 AM PST by vaudine (RO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets

I proved it in college, but I don’t remember how. Do you?


92 posted on 01/25/2008 5:05:13 AM PST by LilAngel (FReeping on a cell phone is like making Christmas dinner in an Easy Bake Oven)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Maine Mariner; NautiNurse

According to his wikiography, Captain Hazelwood was never convicted of operating a vessel while intoxicated. He was convicted of negligent discharge of oil. His master’s lisence is still valid. Good luck finding a billet.

The Exxon-Valdez incident was clearly not a collision, but a grounding, or possibly an allision, although I think grounding is more accurate.


93 posted on 01/25/2008 5:13:55 AM PST by Lonesome in Massachussets (Being an idealist excuses nothing. Hitler was an idealist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: LilAngel
If there is a last prime, then multiply all primes together and add one. The result will not be divisibly by any of them, hence, no last prime.

X = 2*3*5*7*11*13....*P_last +1

Since X isn't divisible by any element of the set [2,3,..P_last], and clearly isn't a member of the set, there can be no last prime.

It turns out the probability that an integer selected at random will be prime is inversely proportional to its natural logarithm. Therefore:

limit N->Infinity {Integral 2 to N(dx/log(x))} = number of primes less than N.

If N = 10, the integral equals 5.12, the number of primes is 4, if N = 10,000,000 the integral equals 664917.360, the number of primes less than a million is 664579.

Is 2147483647 = 2^31-1 prime?

Is 2147483637 ?

94 posted on 01/25/2008 5:43:50 AM PST by Lonesome in Massachussets (Being an idealist excuses nothing. Hitler was an idealist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets
Captain Hazlewood was guilty of asking a licensed Mate to make a turn at a buoy. "See Buoy, make turn."

Having just survived a long sea voyage on a boat crewed by teenagers, I would say that not a man jack of'em would have screwed up that simple order. THe guy who should lose his license would have been that total yutz of a Mate. A lot of this will happen because they lightened up the SATs.

But everything, is the Captain's Fault. Has to be. Ask George Bush.

95 posted on 01/25/2008 6:21:11 AM PST by Kenny Bunk (Dream Tickets: Gore/Obama vs. Petraeus/Blackwell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets

Not only is it not divisible by any of the prime numbers, but it’s not divisible by any whole number other than 1 and itself. So yeah, there’s always more prime numbers.

Don’t talk to me about logs. It gives me a headache.


96 posted on 01/25/2008 7:24:44 AM PST by LilAngel (FReeping on a cell phone is like making Christmas dinner in an Easy Bake Oven)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: The Spirit Of Allegiance
Here in N.Y. State-

% We all live with a Yellow Submarine... %

(Unfortunately in the case of all the Dem candidates, none of them "run silent" or "run deep".)

97 posted on 01/25/2008 7:26:29 AM PST by mikrofon (Hillary as Old Yeller)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets
AS I said before, I thought we had a "sub-prime" crisis, not a shortage of prime numbers. To make you even sicker, we can go on and discuss lone numbers as each prime number has only itself and one (which is the loneliest number) to play with.

And yes, I know what Samuel Johnson said about puns: "He who would pun, would pick a pocket."

It is primarily a profoundly, primative propensity of purposely picking properly pathetic plays on words in perpetuity for personal pleasure.
98 posted on 01/25/2008 7:50:23 AM PST by Sudetenland (Mike Huckabee=Bill Clinton. Can we afford another Clinton in the White House...from either party?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: The Spirit Of Allegiance
Alas poor New Yorik,
I knew him well Harboratio.
A Manhattan of infinite jest.
99 posted on 01/25/2008 7:54:04 AM PST by Sudetenland (Mike Huckabee=Bill Clinton. Can we afford another Clinton in the White House...from either party?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000

Nina, Pinta and Santa Maria...?


100 posted on 01/25/2008 8:50:27 AM PST by Doctor Raoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-107 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson