Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cringing Negativism Network

Your circular logic is almost too clever.

If Hunter had been polling better, then perhaps he would not want his “name” to be a rallying cry when he dropped out.

But in reality, he only had 2-3% support consistently, whether in lib Northeastern states or heavily conservative Western states.

I know many on FR don’t want to believe it, but there are other factors which enter a person’s mind when choosing a candidate, other than “Is he the MOST conservative?”

Republicans ALSO want an affable, likable candidate — one they can relate to.

One they think understands their personal situation, even though that’s impossible.

Duncan would make a GREAT Sec.Defense .... but he was a lousy Presidential candidate.


213 posted on 01/24/2008 6:47:01 AM PST by Edit35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies ]


To: Rock&RollRepublican

“Republicans ALSO want an affable, likable candidate — one they can relate to.”

Oh, I’ll fully admit that Hunter lacked the charisma to be elected, that was my one fear for him from day one; I was hoping he’d find a way to connect with voters on a more personal level, but it never happened.


220 posted on 01/24/2008 7:48:48 AM PST by eclecticEel (oh well, Hunter 2012 anyone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson