I don’t agree with voting third party or not voting.
I will vote for whomever is running against the Marxist.
I have seen two camps here:
(A) anyone but Hillary that has an “R” next to his/her name
-and-
(B) A RINO causes more damage than an outright Democrat because “compromise” bills get passed, and, besides, a message needs to be sent to the RNC.
I fall into camp (B).
Reasonable minds differ, and I respect your position.
I don’t like Romney, but I wouldn’t call him a Marxist.
Might be time to rethink that third party notion.
We know the DhimmiRats won’t support conservative values.
And, it looks a lot like the RepubliCrats don’t have the stones to stand up to for them, at this point.
Granted, fracturing the electorate with a third party might push the pollsters over the edge (not a bad thing, necessarily), and may well assure a Dem victory in ‘08, it would also give voice to the fundamental principles on which this grand experiment was founded. It would be in keeping with the spirit of the First Revolution.
The question is...can there be fashioned a platform from conservative positions that would attract sufficient numbers of voters to be a viable constituency? I think the answer to that one is Yes...
Think I’ll pop over to the Constitution Party’s website for a quick look-see.
With Marxists and pseudomarxists in both parties, who is there to vote for? I'm supporting MOE.