Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: knighthawk

I do believe that it’s in the Constitution now that every president, in his final year, must make an empty gesture to solve the Arab/Israeli conflict. It’s the law!

Besides, they may hate him in the Middle East, but they don’t hate him as much as the Democrats here.


4 posted on 01/21/2008 1:56:51 PM PST by Laptop_Ron (Abstract art is a product of the untalented, sold by the unprincipled to the utterly bewildered. —)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Laptop_Ron
He is far more likely to be successful in countering Iran’s expanding influence and dealing with other major regional problems than in resolving the Arab-Israeli dispute - yet his pursuit of the former goal is impeded by his policies concerning the latter.

Bush seems to have aimed at the wrong targets most of the the 2nd term. His initial Social Security push was ill conceived and pretty much doomed the entire term. Now he’s pushing Israel into a stupid “land for peace” deal.
The only decent thing he’s done in the last three years was put General Petreius in charge of Iraq.

20 posted on 01/21/2008 2:26:07 PM PST by Recon Dad (Marine Spec Ops Dad)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson