Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

2008 Projected Presidential Electoral Votes as of 1/21/2008
InTrade ^ | Monday, January 21, 2008 | Momaw Nadon

Posted on 01/21/2008 9:03:54 AM PST by Momaw Nadon



TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; 2008election; election; electionpresident; elections; electoral; electoralvotes; intrade; presidential; projected; votes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last
To: Ancesthntr
What's so special about tomorrow?

Stock markets are plunging worldwide. Luckily, our stock exchanges aren't open today. Tomorrow's open should be a real bear.

21 posted on 01/21/2008 10:16:53 AM PST by NeoCaveman (El Rushbo head of the El Conservativo tribe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk
President Bush better put a bunch of stuff in place now.

President Bush and McCain and the rest of the RINO's who over spent and proposed selling out our soveriegnty with amnesty are the reason we are even in this predictament. Fred was suppose to be our saving grace until he came out barely swinging until SC primary. We may be in trouble. The only thing going for us is if Hillary wins the nomination. But if Obama gets in, then we are in some deep doo doo.
22 posted on 01/21/2008 10:22:04 AM PST by nckerr (www.myspace.com/ArmyKerrFamily)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Ancesthntr
What's so special about tomorrow?

The DJIA going to drop about 500 points. As a Romney supporter, I hate to say this, but the worse the economy gets, the better it is for Mitt's chances to get the nomination, and the election. He is clearly the most competent and experienced when it comes to economic matters.
23 posted on 01/21/2008 10:24:20 AM PST by Signalman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: NeoCaveman

Yeah. If you think they don’t like a mormon here, well . . . .


24 posted on 01/21/2008 10:46:33 AM PST by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon

IMHO, Missouri and Ohio are not as solid ‘rat’ as the Intrade folks think. Still, that just gets the Republican to 268 EVs.


25 posted on 01/21/2008 10:50:29 AM PST by Recovering_Democrat ((I am SO glad to no longer be associated with the party of Dependence on Government!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abercrombie_guy_38

I am surprised they have Nevada remaining red, or at least pink. Many other analysts seem to think they will flip over this year since the state is trending Demo. Pretty sad. Of course Presidents Reagan and GHW Bush won it by large margins from ‘80-88 but the current President Bush barely took the state.

I would not write off MO or OH so fast. I think also if Tim Pawlenty is the nominee for VP the Repubs could take MN, and maybe WI. That is if millions of us do not stay home or vote third party. With the line up of choices now looking pretty poor, I can easily envision that scenario happening though, sad to say.


26 posted on 01/21/2008 10:52:43 AM PST by TNCMAXQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: LS
Yeah. If you think they don’t like a mormon here, well . . . .

Yup.

LOL.

27 posted on 01/21/2008 11:01:11 AM PST by NeoCaveman (El Rushbo head of the El Conservativo tribe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Technocrat
Romney brings the north (MI, IA, MO)

After spending a mountain of money and practically living in Iowa, Mitt only got 25% of the Republican vote after leading with large margins up until the last few weeks. It seemed that the more the Hawkeye voters saw of Mitt Romney, the less they liked him which doesn't bode well in the general election if Romney is the nominee.

The Missourians that I know would punch you in the nose if you told them Missouri is in the north. Missouri is a possible win for any of the Republican candidates but it is very much a purple state and go easily go blue this fall. Romney won't carry Michigan in the general election, whether it is his home state or not.

28 posted on 01/21/2008 11:37:17 AM PST by CommerceComet (Mitt Romney: boldly saying whatever the audience wants to hear.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon

Do we have to look forward to 52 posts of this per year?


29 posted on 01/21/2008 11:38:09 AM PST by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nckerr
“....President Bush and McCain and the rest of the RINO’s who over spent and proposed selling out our sovereignty with amnesty are the reason we are even in this predicament. .......”

Except I don’t see how voting for the democrat party who doesn’t even think we should be sovereign in the first place improves things! (Voting for democrats = not voting ..is a “de facto” vote for democrats!)

30 posted on 01/21/2008 11:43:30 AM PST by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon; All
ELECTILE DYSFUNCTION:

The inability to become aroused over any of the choices for president put forth by either party in the 2008 election year.

31 posted on 01/21/2008 11:47:32 AM PST by OnRightOnLeftCoast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dangus
Do we have to look forward to 52 posts of this per year?

Well, not 52.

The last weekly projection will be on Monday, November 3, 2008.

32 posted on 01/21/2008 12:05:33 PM PST by Momaw Nadon ("...with the ultimate goal of ending tyranny in our world.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Ancesthntr

Worst day on the stock market since 2001, maybe ever (in point terms).


33 posted on 01/21/2008 12:44:52 PM PST by Technocrat (Romney-Thompson 2008. Or vice versa.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: CommerceComet

My mistake - I meant MN. Dont hurt me :) Also forgot WI.


34 posted on 01/21/2008 12:46:18 PM PST by Technocrat (Romney-Thompson 2008. Or vice versa.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Technocrat
My mistake - I meant MN. Dont hurt me :) Also forgot WI.

Don't worry, I'm not a Missourian. I don't see Romney having any realistic chance in the northern tier states.

Michigan: This might be Romney's home state but I strongly doubt he would carry it in the general election. Getting less than 40% of the vote in your own party in your own state is not impressive for three reasons. First, almost all that margin came in the last few days. Electors shouldn't be making last-minute decisions if the candidate were a very popular home-grown candidate. Second, since the Democrat race was basically a walk-over, lots of Democrats were crossing over playing games in the Republican primary. Many of them probably heeded the advice to vote against the general election candidate the Democrats most fear: John McCain. Third, Romney greatly out-spent his rivals. None of this bodes well for Romney's general election chances.

Minnesota and Wisconsin: What does Romney provide to make you think that he could win these states? Minnesota hasn't voted Republican since 1972. Wisconsin has become less and less blue over the years but the Republicans have yet to break through since Reagan. Romney hasn't shown in the primaries the ability to rally the Republican base or to draw large numbers of independents, both of which are probably necessary to capture these states.

35 posted on 01/21/2008 1:33:08 PM PST by CommerceComet (Mitt Romney: boldly saying whatever the audience wants to hear.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: CommerceComet

You make good points, but I really think the economy is going to be shouting loud enough here to make the difference. Also, I honestly don’t see blue collar states pulling the lever for Hillary - it’s a sexist thing. Those two factors alone I believe will be enough to push them over. Finally, if Romney is smart, and I truly believe that he is, he’ll coordinate with every local republican candidate to energize turnout. In the end, that’s all that matters is turnout anyway - whoever gets it, wins it.

As to MN, maybe that IS is bit of wishful thinking on my part. I lived three years in Rochester and the folks down in that corner of the state aren’t nearly as touched as the Twin Cities nuts.


36 posted on 01/21/2008 1:47:45 PM PST by Technocrat (Romney-Thompson 2008. Or vice versa.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Technocrat

No way Romney wins Iowa.


37 posted on 01/21/2008 1:56:58 PM PST by exhaustguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: exhaustguy

Once the evangelicals don’t have Huckabee to pay attention to, do you really expect them to vote for Hillary? No way. Any halfway decent outreach effort is going to get them, unless Romney comes out strong against farm subsidies, in which case you are right.


38 posted on 01/21/2008 2:20:39 PM PST by Technocrat (Romney-Thompson 2008. Or vice versa.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Momaw Nadon

Tanks for the ping.


39 posted on 01/21/2008 3:16:57 PM PST by upchuck (Attention Senator Clinton: Lying Is Stupid When The Truth Is So Easy To Find)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson