I wrote snail-mail letters to both Bush and Clement.
The justification in the brief for a lower level of scrutiny is extremely weak. It basically just ignores the Second Amendment. I hope that my request that they withdraw this brief doesn't result in them submitting a stronger one.
The only justification for suggesting that "reasonable regulation" isn't an infringement was one early court decision which permitted a ban on concealed carry. One judge's decision is hardly sufficient to outweigh the Founder's intentions to bar infringements.
I recommend that everybody communicate their dissatisfaction with this brief.
“The only justification for suggesting that “reasonable regulation” isn’t an infringement was one early court decision which permitted a ban on concealed carry. One judge’s decision is hardly sufficient to outweigh the Founder’s intentions to bar infringements”
Our Supreme Court Justices have looked to foreign laws in order to interpret our Constitution. I have no faith in them including Roberts.