Posted on 01/20/2008 9:25:43 AM PST by NormsRevenge
California's 33rd Congressional District is hard-core Democrat.
Ethnically diverse, cutting a swath from Hollywood through the city's historic black heartland, it's so thick with Democrats that John Kerry won 83 percent of the vote during the 2004 presidential election. Republicans didn't even bother to field a candidate in the last U.S. House race.
So why would Rudy Giuliani and Mitt Romney be interested in voters here?
In a twist on political logic, heavily Democratic patches in California are being fiercely contested by some Republican presidential candidates because of a change in state election rules.
For the first time in a contested race, the California GOP will distribute delegates based on the winner in each of the state's congressional districts, rather than to the candidate who piles up the most votes statewide.
The move has upended conventional campaign strategy, turning the Feb. 5 Republican primary into a chessboard of 53 separate contests, each with a prize of three delegates. To win the GOP presidential nomination, a candidate must secure 1,191 delegates in elections across the country.
Because only registered Republicans can vote in California's GOP presidential primary, there's temptation to pursue Democratic-leaning districts. A Republican candidate has to sway a relatively small number of voters to win.
A Democratic stronghold such as the 33rd District has about 30,000 registered Republicans. That's a fraction of the number in bedrock GOP territory such as the largely rural 22nd District in Kern, San Luis Obispo and Los Angeles counties, which has 165,000 Republicans.
In a crowded field with moderate turnout, a candidate could win the 33rd and claim its delegates with a few thousand votes, a number smaller than would be needed to win many city council races.
"It's a little like jujitsu. With the right application of a little amount of force, you could prevail," said Republican National Committee treasurer Tim Morgan.
"It changes the whole formula," said Republican pollster Steve Kinney, who is backing Arizona Sen. John McCain. "You can end up with far less votes overall and have most of the delegates."
Simple economics are at work, too. In a race where dollars are tight - there are more than 20 presidential contests on Feb. 5 - it costs a GOP campaign less to contact voters in a Democratic district, where Republican registration is slim.
Another likely target: the San Francisco district of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., where fewer than one in 10 voters is registered as a Republican.
Giuliani, the former mayor of heavily Democratic New York City, could have an advantage in urban areas, given his left-leaning record on abortion, gay rights and gun control. California's coastal counties tend to be more liberal, while inland counties are more conservative.
"There are districts where the mayor would naturally run strongly that are heavily Democratic," said Giuliani's state chairman, Bill Simon.
The interest in Democratic districts is an unintended consequence of a rule change that was designed to lure more candidates to each region of the state, as well as build up political organizations in each congressional district that could benefit the party overall.
But with the priority on Iowa, New Hampshire and other early presidential contests, the state has seen little campaigning by candidates. No Republican has run a TV ad in California's costly media markets. Some, short on money, are likely to rely solely on volunteers to generate turnout on Feb. 5.
McCain, for example, has begun to organize a California campaign but with an all-volunteer effort.
So far, only Giuliani and Romney have had the money to support significant grass-roots activity in California, such as running phone banks to contact voters.
The GOP race in California mirrors the national contest - it's wide open. But Morgan, of the Republican National Committee, and other party members already are debating whether the district-by-district division of delegates makes sense.
Meanwhile, the party is struggling to reverse a slide in registration that comes as an unwelcome sign in a presidential election year. Both major parties have been losing membership in California, while the fastest growing segment of the electorate has no party affiliation at all.
Independents account for nearly 20 percent of California's 15.5 million registered voters.
The last time a GOP candidate carried California in a presidential election was 1988, when George H.W. Bush was elected. There were 5.4 million Republican voters at the time, about 39 percent of the California electorate.
Republicans now make up about 33 percent of California voters, compared to 43 percent for Democrats. Between February and December last year, the GOP lost more than 170,000 registered voters in the state. The Democratic decline in that period was about 69,000 voters.
They still don't get it. Republicans in those areas of California are just as conservative as other Republicans -- if not more so. San Francisco Republicans are not New York Republicans. There is a big damn difference.
About those voting machines: http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3b5f56ad3dd5.htm
See Post #55/56. The rewst is good, too, though. An oldie but goodie
California - Voter Registration as of December 7, 2007 CD Total Reg Dem Rep All other Dem Rep All other 1 342,750 154,901 97,220 90,629 45.2% 28.4% 26.4% 2 343,531 113,614 151,851 78,066 33.1% 44.2% 22.7% 3 365,836 133,016 153,398 79,422 36.4% 41.9% 21.7% 4 408,408 123,772 193,658 90,978 30.3% 47.4% 22.3% 5 268,030 136,261 64,567 67,202 50.8% 24.1% 25.1% 6 334,856 172,597 78,087 84,172 51.5% 23.3% 25.1% 7 260,653 143,102 57,121 60,430 54.9% 21.9% 23.2% 8 331,071 182,528 32,354 116,189 55.1% 9.8% 35.1% 9 320,853 199,707 30,182 90,964 62.2% 9.4% 28.4% 10 329,542 148,739 104,531 76,272 45.1% 31.7% 23.1% 11 335,904 126,237 141,605 68,062 37.6% 42.2% 20.3% 12 328,375 166,587 66,790 94,998 50.7% 20.3% 28.9% 13 266,256 139,056 50,605 76,595 52.2% 19.0% 28.8% 14 307,251 140,997 82,531 83,723 45.9% 26.9% 27.2% 15 260,648 113,525 70,208 76,915 43.6% 26.9% 29.5% 16 231,641 110,382 57,811 63,448 47.7% 25.0% 27.4% 17 255,600 130,032 65,825 59,743 50.9% 25.8% 23.4% 18 240,964 113,894 86,237 40,833 47.3% 35.8% 16.9% 19 324,218 116,734 148,418 59,066 36.0% 45.8% 18.2% 20 185,939 93,488 63,672 28,779 50.3% 34.2% 15.5% 21 274,180 92,416 133,474 48,290 33.7% 48.7% 17.6% 22 325,926 98,280 165,205 62,441 30.2% 50.7% 19.2% 23 282,087 127,082 85,370 69,635 45.1% 30.3% 24.7% 24 346,443 119,151 150,186 77,106 34.4% 43.4% 22.3% 25 316,079 110,980 134,000 71,099 35.1% 42.4% 22.5% 26 338,133 113,827 147,311 76,995 33.7% 43.6% 22.8% 27 276,000 130,318 78,287 67,395 47.2% 28.4% 24.4% 28 224,711 124,107 43,808 56,796 55.2% 19.5% 25.3% 29 287,102 124,450 84,976 77,676 43.3% 29.6% 27.1% 30 387,249 193,414 94,921 98,914 49.9% 24.5% 25.5% 31 171,484 98,805 26,706 45,973 57.6% 15.6% 26.8% 32 220,603 111,287 54,793 54,523 50.4% 24.8% 24.7% 33 273,705 175,786 32,423 65,496 64.2% 11.8% 23.9% 34 178,153 102,597 34,421 41,135 57.6% 19.3% 23.1% 35 234,744 151,902 34,299 48,543 64.7% 14.6% 20.7% 36 313,495 137,252 95,592 80,651 43.8% 30.5% 25.7% 37 251,673 146,340 47,096 58,237 58.1% 18.7% 23.1% 38 226,337 125,750 50,910 49,677 55.6% 22.5% 21.9% 39 240,028 121,087 67,055 51,886 50.4% 27.9% 21.6% 40 327,744 105,538 150,031 72,175 32.2% 45.8% 22.0% 41 321,565 104,228 150,128 67,209 32.4% 46.7% 20.9% 42 348,915 100,872 171,263 76,780 28.9% 49.1% 22.0% 43 209,379 98,906 68,631 41,842 47.2% 32.8% 20.0% 44 303,430 97,222 139,439 66,769 32.0% 46.0% 22.0% 45 304,995 109,560 136,232 59,203 35.9% 44.7% 19.4% 46 391,146 119,719 180,081 91,346 30.6% 46.0% 23.4% 47 202,146 85,964 72,803 43,379 42.5% 36.0% 21.5% 48 412,235 112,862 199,511 99,862 27.4% 48.4% 24.2% 49 275,741 79,515 129,745 66,481 28.8% 47.1% 24.1% 50 341,648 102,133 147,403 92,112 29.9% 43.1% 27.0% 51 249,375 117,777 71,718 59,880 47.2% 28.8% 24.0% 52 315,512 95,113 142,947 77,452 30.1% 45.3% 24.5% 53 254,262 105,364 72,743 76,155 41.4% 28.6% 30.0% 15,468,551 6,598,773 5,190,179 3,679,599 42.7% 33.6% 23.8%
See my 4th congressional district above? We bees conservative!!! (thank God fer little favors!)
Yeah, but you 200,000 conservatives have as much pull (same amount of delegates) as the 30,000 pubbies in Pelosi’s district.
It just don’t seem right! ;-)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.