Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Eagle Eye

I’d argue that making a transition to a new taxation system while making the taxation revenue neutral is exactly maintaining and defending the status quo. That is what annoys me the most about the FT, the gov’t won’t be changing.


188 posted on 01/20/2008 2:18:12 PM PST by Paladin2 (Huma for co-president!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies ]


To: Paladin2

Congressional spending is another topic requiring another solution.

Maybe one thing at a time?

Some congressman at one time proposed that Congress be required to cite Constitutional authority for any bill that they proposed.

I like the idea. Congress didn’t.

For whatever tweaks the FT might need, it can drastically reduce or eliminate the IRS. That is a notable accomplishment in itself. Next would be dismantling the BATF and folding any legitimate duties into existing agencies. But again, another topic and another solution needed.


190 posted on 01/20/2008 2:25:03 PM PST by Eagle Eye (Agreeing with Democrats = agreeing with Al Queada)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson