Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FairTax cut for 2-parent families
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | January 19, 2008 | Howard and Raymond Richman

Posted on 01/20/2008 6:29:07 AM PST by Man50D

During an election season, one of the first losers is the truth. The current misinformation campaign against the FairTax has been particularly virulent. Last month the FairTax was being panned by some columnists as a "crackpot scheme," even though it could be collected exactly the same way as its close cousin, the value-added tax, which is the most successful tax in the world. This month the FairTax is being vilified by various columnists as a tax increase for the middle class, even though it would provide a substantial tax cut for two-parent middle class families. Specifically, in a recent column, George Will asked, "Do you want a president (Mike Huckabee, proponent of a national sales tax of at least 30 percent) pledged to radically increase the proportion of federal taxes paid by the middle class?" Similarly, Time magazine's business and economics columnist Justin Fox wrote a blog piece entitled, "The FairTax and its big break for the $200,000-plus crowd."

The FairTax is a national sales tax that would replace the income taxes, the payroll taxes, and the gift and inheritance taxes. It would be a 30 percent sales tax on retail purchases. Since 30 cents is 23 percent of $1.30 (the amount you would pay on a $1 item), a 30 percent FairTax would cost you about 23 percent of your consumption. To help you pay the tax, you would get a prebate check or a debit card credit at the beginning of each month equivalent to the amount you would pay when buying necessities. In 2007, that amount would have been based upon $10,210 spending per adult and $3,480 spending per child.

(Excerpt) Read more at worldnetdaily.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 501-520521-540541-560 ... 621-636 next last
To: robertpaulsen
"You're going to spend it?"

As others have pointed out, it's only when you buy a NEW car that you have trouble. Just go get a hooptie and all will be cool.

BTW, what do you think about the tuition exclusion of the FT (where "all goods and services are taxed, without exception")?

521 posted on 01/22/2008 4:43:07 AM PST by Paladin2 (Huma for co-president!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 518 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen
"Mojave's question to you remains unanswered"

Apparently the more problematic questions remain unanswered as the FT b0ts are not programmed to handle those yet.

522 posted on 01/22/2008 4:46:08 AM PST by Paladin2 (Huma for co-president!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 515 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2
"Getting into a he said/she said 23/30% discussion/argument can be fun"

I fault the Fair Taxers -- they're the ones who called it a national retail "sales" tax.

If they would have called it a national retailer income tax or somesuch, there would be no discussion/argument.

523 posted on 01/22/2008 4:56:43 AM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 519 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen
I believe that HR25 calls it a sales tax, which it would be without the prebate.
524 posted on 01/22/2008 4:58:54 AM PST by Paladin2 (Huma for co-president!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 523 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2
"BTW, what do you think about the tuition exclusion of the FT"

I think it's just the beginning of "exclusions".

Oh. I predict the "prebate" will be means-tested within the first two years.

525 posted on 01/22/2008 4:59:57 AM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 521 | View Replies]

To: Daveinyork
"But in spite of occasional caterwauling by grandstanding congressmen and senators, the IRS does exactly what it has been assigned to do by Congress"

For those FTers would so hate the IRS - call your congress critter.

526 posted on 01/22/2008 5:05:33 AM PST by Paladin2 (Huma for co-president!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 520 | View Replies]

To: baybabe
""BTW, what do you think about the tuition exclusion of the FT"

I think it's just the beginning of "exclusions".

Oh. I predict the "prebate" will be means-tested within the first two years."

Baybabe, what say you?

527 posted on 01/22/2008 5:07:24 AM PST by Paladin2 (Huma for co-president!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 525 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2
"We can never discount the kleptomaniac vote. People will simply not give up their government check in exchange for lower taxes. Rather they will vote for politicians who promise to shift the burden to others."

Another quote from the link a page back (100 post/page).

Hence the prebate.

528 posted on 01/22/2008 5:25:38 AM PST by Paladin2 (Huma for co-president!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 527 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

OOPs, same page, link @ #520.


529 posted on 01/22/2008 5:30:53 AM PST by Paladin2 (Huma for co-president!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 528 | View Replies]

To: lucysmom
How’s it worked out for Nauru?

A Micronesian island nation that exports only phosphate? After it ravaged its environment it tried to become a tax have but mainly became a money laundering center. You think that's a valid comparisson? LOL!

530 posted on 01/22/2008 6:23:25 AM PST by groanup (IRS. It's what we live for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 442 | View Replies]

To: groanup
Merely illustrating that the “tax haven” designation has a sleazy connotation.

While the elimination of corporate income taxes, and taxes on investments would make the US a good place to locate corporate headquarters and park one's money; the sales tax would make the US a bad place to live.

I doubt the FairTax would do much for manufacturing, but would be good for financial services.

531 posted on 01/22/2008 7:57:27 AM PST by lucysmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 530 | View Replies]

To: lucysmom
How's Lucy?

I suspect she couldn't get far with the "...but everyone else's mom says it's OK..." :-)

What doesn't kill ya makes you stronger.

532 posted on 01/22/2008 12:04:38 PM PST by Paladin2 (Huma for co-president!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 531 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

I’d take this over the income tax any day of the week.


533 posted on 01/22/2008 12:06:25 PM PST by Antoninus ("Make all the promises you have to." --Mitt Romney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: baybabe
It’s not that I doubt the sincerity of the FT’s backers.

I base my trepidation on what is likely to come out of the legislative sausage factory.

534 posted on 01/22/2008 1:14:10 PM PST by afortiori
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 393 | View Replies]

To: scfirewall

“Flat tax.....I understand that.”

Which flat tax proposal do you support?


535 posted on 01/22/2008 2:01:45 PM PST by phil_will1 (My posts are in no way limited or restricted by previously expressed SQL opinions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: pepperdog

“Regardless of the system used 30% is an abomination! Just think THIRTY PERCENT! Almost one third of every dollar in your pocket. And then you still have the city, county and state taxes. Ugh!”

Right! It is much better to hide the true cost of government, than to put it in everyone’s face, wouldn’t you say? The current system is outstanding in that regard.


536 posted on 01/22/2008 2:05:34 PM PST by phil_will1 (My posts are in no way limited or restricted by previously expressed SQL opinions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: oiler

“I therefore respectfully disagree and suggest a FlatTax for your consideration.”

Which flat tax proposal do you support?


537 posted on 01/22/2008 2:11:13 PM PST by phil_will1 (My posts are in no way limited or restricted by previously expressed SQL opinions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

“Hence all those who live at home in the basement are strongly attracted to the FT (along with drug dealers and others who don’t want to report their income).”

So you think that drug dealers are reporting their income today?

Are you sure you want to stake out that territory?


538 posted on 01/22/2008 2:13:18 PM PST by phil_will1 (My posts are in no way limited or restricted by previously expressed SQL opinions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

“What makes a tax successful”

“One that politicians love. All sorts of ‘rats want a VAT ‘just like Europe.’”

Bruce Bartlett, one of the most vocal of the FT’s critics, is a strong supporter of a VAT. He would love to add it in addition to the income tax.


539 posted on 01/22/2008 2:15:37 PM PST by phil_will1 (My posts are in no way limited or restricted by previously expressed SQL opinions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory

“...the Fairscammers are so delusionally invested in this specific proposal that they can not see of some OTHER way to achieve all our mutual goals.”

Which alternative proposal would you say is the most politically viable at the present time? Is there a bill in congress which accomplishes what the FT does and which is gathering any momentum at all?


540 posted on 01/22/2008 2:19:22 PM PST by phil_will1 (My posts are in no way limited or restricted by previously expressed SQL opinions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 501-520521-540541-560 ... 621-636 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson