Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Despite a disappointing finish, Thompson doesn't bow out
Chicago Tribune ^ | Jan. 19, 2008 | William Douglas

Posted on 01/19/2008 6:31:23 PM PST by FocusNexus

Former Tennessee Sen. Fred Thompson didn't drop out of the Republican presidential field after his disappointing finish in Saturday's South Carolina primary -- but he sounded close to it.

About an hour after the polls closed, Thompson addressed a ballroom in a college student union, an event that featured as many students enjoying free beer as it did hardcore Thompson supporters. He delivered a lengthy soliloquy, speaking in the past tense about "clear conservatism," the cornerstone of his campaign.

"My friends, we will always be bound by a close bond because we have traveled a very special road together for a very special purpose," Thompson told the crowd. "It's never even been about me, it's never been about you. It's been about our country."

Thompson's campaign declined to say whether the speech was a concession, a swan song, a stump speech to signal that he's fighting on, or what. Campaign spokesmen wouldn't say what the former Tennessee senator's next move is.

"The campaign is still a campaign until it's not the campaign," said Rich Galen, a Thompson campaign senior adviser. "There's no hurry to make a decision, other than your deadline. I don't have anything to add -- not tonight."

Thompson conceded earlier Saturday that he needed a win in South Carolina to keep his presidential campaign alive.

(Excerpt) Read more at chicagotribune.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: South Carolina
KEYWORDS: elections; fredthompson; gopprimary; sc2008
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 261-280 next last
To: Brimack34

“I kind of think that is what Fred has been doing (helping McCain) and we were all suckered.”

That would bemy guess. You’ll know for sure if Fred continues in the face of certain doom. He doesn’t have a real possibility of getting the nomination at this point, so the only reason to continue is to split the vote. Freds endorsement wouldn’t help McCain, conseratives would just ignore it, but siphoning votes from Huckabee & Romney would help.


121 posted on 01/19/2008 7:49:53 PM PST by snarkybob (')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: Finny
I’m almost to the point that I would vote for Hillary before I voted for McCain or Hucklebutt. Only because I would rather have the country face rabid Clintonian Marxism now when there is still some willingness to fight back then to let a Rino prep the population for it.

The sorry state of Conservatism right now is directly do to a President and Congress that turned away from Classic Libealism and toward Keynsian statism. Put a Rino in office with a Democrat legislature, and we will lose more Governship, Judicial appointments, and congress critters.

122 posted on 01/19/2008 7:51:28 PM PST by Dead Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Huck

McPain is certain Amnesty and certain hegemonic conflict escalation . He is no Conservative .


123 posted on 01/19/2008 7:52:05 PM PST by Neu Pragmatist (No RINO's -VOTE FRED ... Thank you :))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Neu Pragmatist
You’ve been talking Fred down for quite some time , so just exactly who is your RINO of choice ?

I've been predicting what has come to pass. Fred's demise as a candidate. I think Rudy is a goner too, and probably Huckabee as well. I think it comes down to Romney v McCain, and I think Romney is the better choice.

124 posted on 01/19/2008 7:52:28 PM PST by Huck (Ok, I'll sneak in a few posts here and there and try to stay out of trouble.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj
Ouch!...lol..Thats gonna leave a mark!...

even RINO hide can bleed when u hit em that hard..

125 posted on 01/19/2008 7:53:22 PM PST by M-cubed (Why is "Greshams Law" a law?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Neu Pragmatist

McPain and GWB are on the same page re: amnesty. So what? If you have proamnesty vs proamnesty in the general election, you have to look to other factors to make a choice. For me, nat’l defense makes the choice of GOP v DEM very clear, and very easy.


126 posted on 01/19/2008 7:54:15 PM PST by Huck (Ok, I'll sneak in a few posts here and there and try to stay out of trouble.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: Huck

And in a Romney vs Hillary/Obama contest... why bother voting?


127 posted on 01/19/2008 7:55:00 PM PST by Teacher317 (Eta kuram na smekh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Brimack34

“I kind of think that is what Fred has been doing (helping McCain) and we were all suckered.”

I don’t know if Fred’s done that to this point, but if he continues about all he can accomplish will be to help McCain by taking votes from Huckabee and Romney. If Fred endorses McCain, I’ll lose all respect for him.

I’ve hoped for months that either Fred or Romney would emerge as the winner. No real preference of the two. Rush, Levin and other conservative talkers have as much as said the same thing, praising the stances of both during recent weeks while pointing out their differences with McCain and others.

Romney, and many before him, have changed some positions when going from state to nationwide campaigns. I believe Romney would govern as he says now, flip-flops or not. I think his real flip-flops were to win in liberal Mass. and his positions now are what he’s probably always been.

Fred and Romney are very close on the issues, especially immigration. If Fred endorsed McCain he’d be abandoning what he’s campaigned on thus far. I’m definitely hoping Romney can win it now that Fred’s seems finished.

All Fred supporters need to take a fresh look at Romney. He’s closer to Fred than any others by far.


128 posted on 01/19/2008 7:55:17 PM PST by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: M-cubed

So, what do YOU think Reagan did in 76? Think he voted GOP? Or do you think he stayed home?


129 posted on 01/19/2008 7:55:24 PM PST by Huck (Ok, I'll sneak in a few posts here and there and try to stay out of trouble.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

I may be wrong, but isn’t Thompson the one who’s getting the ongoing Conservative endorsements?

The media is treating Thompson like the unborn child — refusing to admit he’s viable.


130 posted on 01/19/2008 7:55:56 PM PST by Gene Eric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Going to Thompson	8.7%		44

Whooo Hooo!! Not only does Fred's support remain strong, he's picked up a few supporters!

(I just checked again...that number is now 52.)

131 posted on 01/19/2008 7:58:45 PM PST by jellybean (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/keyword?k=dailyfread Proud Ann-droid and a Steyn-aholic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Huck
I worked on a campaign in 76, and while I don’t know who Reagan voted for, I cannot remember him out campaigning for Ford. Similar to now with Fred, the party establishment didn’t treat Reagan to nicely.
132 posted on 01/19/2008 8:00:46 PM PST by Rational Thought
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: Huck
IF Fred staying in keeps Huckabee from winning anything, then I hope Fred stays until the Convention.

McCain nauseates me, but even he would be better than the lying slimebag scumball from Arkansas.

133 posted on 01/19/2008 8:01:11 PM PST by commish (Freedom tastes sweetest to those who have fought to protect it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Huck

Hillary will absolutely escalate M.E. conflict as well .

Hillary will try to prove that she is a hawk on the military aggression issue , I believe , with devastating results .


134 posted on 01/19/2008 8:01:54 PM PST by Neu Pragmatist (No RINO's -VOTE FRED ... Thank you :))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: FastCoyote
"That means the Mitt, Huckabee and even Giuliani votes would be up for grabs."

Yup. If McCain holds up, Huckabee for sure is dead. No way will the big states go for him. Same for Mitt. The only way now to prevent the rinos McCain or Giuliani from getting the nomination is for Huckabee and Mitt to drop out and get behind the only all around consistent conservative in in the race that can pull all three legs of the Reagan coalition back together, FRed Thompson!

Social conservatives, fiscal conservatives and security conservatives should all unite behind FRed! The Reagan Revolution has not yet begun to fight!!

On to victory in FRed November!!

Go, FRed, GO!!

135 posted on 01/19/2008 8:02:23 PM PST by Jim Robinson (Our God-given unalienable rights are not open to debate, negotiation or compromise!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: ShadowDancer; jwalsh07
I don't give a crap whether McCain can beat Hillary or not....

Jwalsh, if it comes down to McCain vs. Hillary, I tell you true I'm just going to avert my eyes to the whole train wreck. Truly. Two completely insane whackos with serious psycho-personal *iss-yews* in their personal lives whom I am powerless to prevent one from becoming president of these dear United States? I want to even pay attention? Puh-leeeeze! I don't need the mental aggravation. I'll be surfing UFO and anti-vegan threads.

Hell, if I gave it any thought, I might vote hands-down for Hillary because it would be a gift of gold to the Republican party. I am convinced that in REAL life, were she actually IN PLACE, she would quickly end up doing more damage to the Democrat party than you can even comprehend. She is a Republican Bugga-Boo no matter how it turns out.

McCain, on the other hand, would auger in and the Republican party would be holding the bag. So ... (shrugging) ...

136 posted on 01/19/2008 8:02:33 PM PST by Finny (FOX News: "We report only what we like. You decide based on what we decide.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Huck
If Thompson stays in, he's going to help McCain by taking votes from Huck and Romney.

If Thompson quits, he's going to help McCain by endorsing him.

You are so full of crap and preconceived notions. You twist every occurrence to try to support them, making up facts and motives as you go along. But in the end it's nothing more than lies and BS.

137 posted on 01/19/2008 8:02:56 PM PST by Styria
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FocusNexus
You put your finger right on the heart of the problem in a few well-chosen words.

Leni

138 posted on 01/19/2008 8:04:09 PM PST by MinuteGal (Fun Freepathon Contest (movies) Now Underway on Thread III, #425. ENTER NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Huck
Golly, you have certainly been sneaking in more than a few posts. But this reply has to be the best. Showed your true big "R" Republican colors.

Your choice is whomever the party puts forward.

It is still a puzzlement to me why you have put the fork in Fred's back and twisted so hard of late.

Could you possibly be one of the numerous "middle of the road" Republicans that care more about party and power than the well being of our Constitutional Republic?

Party first and then if they can drop in a little principle from time to time, a little "red meat" for the dumb conservative base that never leaves the reservation, all will be OK?

Rhetorical questions. Reply really not needed. But of course take the last word as you have been all evening!

139 posted on 01/19/2008 8:06:19 PM PST by ImpBill ("America ... Where are you now?" --Greg Adams--Brownsville, TX --On the other Front Line)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Finny
No argument from me there Pal!...Ill be writing in Fred myself...I refuse to drive or even ride in the get-a-way Car of the hi-jacking of the Republic
140 posted on 01/19/2008 8:07:40 PM PST by M-cubed (Why is "Greshams Law" a law?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 261-280 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson