Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ron Paul calls for Nevada to postpone Caucus, vote fraud potential
USA Daily behind a proxy address ^ | 1-18-07 | Larry Fester

Posted on 01/19/2008 11:11:39 AM PST by NoLibZone

Today, the Ron Paul 2008 campaign is calling on the Nevada State Republican Party to re-examine what it calls multiple inconsistencies in the Nevada Caucus process, and to consider postponing the caucus, which is scheduled for Saturday, January 19.

“The inconsistencies, errors and multiple changes in the rules reek of playing politics with the what should be a neutral process,” said Ron Paul 2008 campaign manager Lew Moore. “The people of Nevada deserve to know exactly what the rules are and to know that those rules are being fairly enforced. This has not happened up to this point, and the caucus appears to be in chaos.”

Paul’s campaign says that the problem of multiple rule changes is being compounded by other inconsistencies and errors in the process. Many Nevada Republicans have received postcards with incorrect information about their caucus location, and the Nevada GOP website had incorrect caucus locations listed as late as Wednesday, January 16.

Additionally, one or more county chairs have expressed concerns over an insufficient number of ballots, and the Ron Paul campaign has heard reports that rural counties are short of ballots, while Clark County precincts were given what is regarded as far too many ballots.

The Ron Paul campaign has learned that the Nevada Republican Party has changed the rules for eligibility requirements for caucusing three times since January 9. Last summer when the January 19 caucus was set, the Nevada GOP announced that caucus would be closed and only for Republicans who had registered by December 19.

On January 10, 2008, a caucus director for the Nevada Republican Party reversed the earlier policy and anounced a new standard by stating that any person who asserts that they are a registered Republican in the precinct but cannot be found in the voter rolls that the Republican party has, would be able to participate if they signed an affidavit attesting to the fact that they were a registered Republican. Then, on January 15 the Ron Paul campaign received communication from the state party that the affidavits would not be used.

However, on January 17 the policy was changed for a third time, as the state party announced that affidavits would be in use throughout the state, subject to the discretion of county central committees and chairs.

The Nevada Republican Party is changing the rules from week to week, and currently the rules will not even be uniform across the state, as eligibility rules may differ from county to county.

Given the caucus location confusion – with potential caucus participants not knowing where to go – and the new rule effectively allowing anyone to get a ballot, the Ron Paul campaign is concerned that the confusion surrounding the caucus will both disenfranchise voters and make the election particularly susceptible to vote fraud.


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; US: Nevada
KEYWORDS: elections2008; nevadacaucus; nv2008; ronpaul
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

1 posted on 01/19/2008 11:11:46 AM PST by NoLibZone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

The caucus was a disaster, from my personal observations. The Paul people were the only ones with a clue or a plan.

This was a Charlie Foxtrot, and future turnout will be abysmal.


2 posted on 01/19/2008 11:13:21 AM PST by Atlas Sneezed ("We do have tough gun laws in Massachusetts; I support them, I won't chip away at them" -Mitt Romney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

What a goof.

Ron Paul is an embarrassment, to libertarians everywhere.


3 posted on 01/19/2008 11:14:04 AM PST by Cringing Negativism Network (So-called free trade advocates = "China Firsters")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

Why didn’t Paul just send in his SA to bust up the voting?


4 posted on 01/19/2008 11:14:25 AM PST by counterpunch (GOP Convention '08 — Go For Brokered!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #5 Removed by Moderator

To: NoLibZone

Too late.


6 posted on 01/19/2008 11:15:19 AM PST by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone; PaleoCon1

Well, PaleoCon1, looks like you called it right. Paul is screaming fraud already.


7 posted on 01/19/2008 11:15:19 AM PST by CaspersGh0sts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beelzebubba

“This was a Charlie Foxtrot, and future turnout will be abysmal.”

I realize you have every bias -—er, reason-— to say so.


8 posted on 01/19/2008 11:16:29 AM PST by CaspersGh0sts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone
Paul: "I am gonna lose Nevada! Its Fraud!"

This proves he is a Libtard.

Loss means fraud.

Sound familiar?

He gets into real redneck country and starts up this $hit?

No way that Paul will survive the Red State America filter.

9 posted on 01/19/2008 11:17:44 AM PST by Candor7 (Fascism? All it takes is for good men to say nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

Since Fox declared Romney the winner at 9:00AM NV time, I’d say this is just a bit late.


10 posted on 01/19/2008 11:18:34 AM PST by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CaspersGh0sts

“This was a Charlie Foxtrot, and future turnout will be abysmal.”

I realize you have every bias -—er, reason-— to say so.


Huh?

If I hadn’t spoken up in support of Fred, the only voice in my precinct (and the adjacent one in the same facility) would have been for RP.)

The RP supporters were the only ones who had a plan to exploit the incompetent process. They won, in a way that exit polling won’t show. And I’m not happy about it.


11 posted on 01/19/2008 11:20:35 AM PST by Atlas Sneezed ("We do have tough gun laws in Massachusetts; I support them, I won't chip away at them" -Mitt Romney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

Why is this not a surprise coming from the Kook Paul people?


12 posted on 01/19/2008 11:20:46 AM PST by Old Retired Army Guy (tHE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kittymyrib
Since Fox declared Romney the winner at 9:00AM NV time, I’d say this is just a bit late.

The article is dated yesterday.

13 posted on 01/19/2008 11:20:54 AM PST by FoxInSocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

I don’t know what RuPaul’s bitching about, he get’s 3rd, ahead of Thompson. Again.


14 posted on 01/19/2008 11:21:14 AM PST by Cyber Liberty (Don't trust anyone who can’t take a joke. [Congressman BillyBob])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone
Paul's a little late as the votes are now being reported.

              votes

Romney		526	
McCain		185
Paul		159  	
Huckabee	112
Thompson	116 
Guiliani	 40
Hunter		 21 

http://www.nvgopcaucus.com/results

15 posted on 01/19/2008 11:21:18 AM PST by deport (16 days Super Tuesday -- [ Meanwhile:-- Cue Spooky Music--])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

Pretty pathetic way for Paul to shoot himself in his own foot. He is coming in 2nd out there.


16 posted on 01/19/2008 11:21:34 AM PST by MNJohnnie (Instead of "Swift Boaters", 2008 Democrats have "Short Bussers"-Freeper Sax)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
Have you all seen this ?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jEcUTYbuDvY

17 posted on 01/19/2008 11:27:58 AM PST by Afronaut (Press 2 for English - Thanks Mr. President !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

The winner has been declared, it’s over but why not postpone anyway.


18 posted on 01/19/2008 11:29:53 AM PST by RightWhale (Dean Koonz is good, but my favorite authors are Dun and Bradstreet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

I was just looking at the FoxNews results. Romney is walking away with it. He has about 45%. Oddly, though, Paul is in second place, with 15%. He’s beating McCain.


19 posted on 01/19/2008 11:30:19 AM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone
Ron Paul's chads are hanging,...recount, recount...hahahhhhhhhhhha...
20 posted on 01/19/2008 11:31:47 AM PST by AmericanMade1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson