To: ex-Texan
It isn’t Bush’s fault that Putin refused to rise to the place in history that he could have
Initiailly, it was appropriate for Bush to publically give Putin the benefit of the doubt to see if he’d turn into being a real leader instead of another pinko commie power-dictator. After Putin started showing his true colors, that benefit of doubt existed no more and the two of them were not close or trusting.
8 posted on
01/19/2008 4:44:45 AM PST by
prairiebreeze
(Fred '08 The CONSERVATIVE CHOICE)
To: prairiebreeze
It isnt Bushs fault that Putin refused to rise to the place in history that he could have Initiailly, it was appropriate for Bush to publically give Putin the benefit of the doubt to see if hed turn into being a real leader instead of another pinko commie power-dictator. After Putin started showing his true colors, that benefit of doubt existed no more and the two of them were not close or trusting.Well written... with a clear-headed understanding of history.
12 posted on
01/19/2008 4:57:30 AM PST by
rhombus
To: prairiebreeze
Initiailly, it was appropriate for Bush to publically give Putin the benefit of the doubt to see if hed turn into being a real leader instead of another pinko commie power-dictator.
Everyone knew Putin's background - head of the KGB, i.e, head of an outfit that routinely tortured people - well, it takes a certain kind of person to be able to do that for a living. And then the other stuff, associating with gangsters, etc.
Knowing all that, was there ever ANY evidence to suggest that he would be a benevolent leader?
To: prairiebreeze
No, it’s Yeltsin’s fault. If he had stayed more sober, he might have been more in control of the situation over there when he was president. Delegating to scum like Putin was extremely stupid.
86 posted on
01/19/2008 4:00:32 PM PST by
dr_who_2
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson