Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Soaring soyabean price stirs anger among poor(enviros: the enemy of the masses)
FT ^ | 01/18/08 | Raphael Minder, John Aglionby, and Jung-a Song

Posted on 01/17/2008 11:35:09 PM PST by TigerLikesRooster

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last
To: Toddsterpatriot

How does an option buyer make money? Who does he buy the option from?

From an institution that is usually not in the possesion of the underlying good.


21 posted on 01/21/2008 8:40:52 AM PST by Rummenigge (there are people willing to blow out the light because it casts a shadow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Rummenigge

It’s all on a piece of paper. As money is.


22 posted on 01/21/2008 8:41:39 AM PST by Rummenigge (there are people willing to blow out the light because it casts a shadow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

enlighten me ... once in your life :)


23 posted on 01/21/2008 8:43:26 AM PST by Rummenigge (there are people willing to blow out the light because it casts a shadow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Rummenigge
From an institution that is usually not in the possesion of the underlying good.

So the buyer makes $2 when the underlying goes from $10 to $12 and the seller loses $2.

24 posted on 01/21/2008 8:45:43 AM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists so bad at math?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

Ummm no ?! There’s usually a leverage and a spread - isn’t there ?

By selling back and forth the banks ‘earn’ a lot of money.

So the buyer makes maybe 2$ times 4 minus 20% spread.... and because the buyer (as the seller) is most probably an institution that doesn’t work with it’s own capital it’s minus some more percent for interests.

It’s not the 2 dollar back and forth - it’s the interests on captial - the spreads - and all that.

There’s so much capital in these markets that doesn’t really produce a benefit. It’s like the housing bubble - so much economy around a guy that cannot pay for his house. It’s excessively printed money at work.

Watch it collaps as gold goes to 2k$


25 posted on 01/21/2008 9:03:49 AM PST by Rummenigge (there are people willing to blow out the light because it casts a shadow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Rummenigge
Ummm no ?! There’s usually a leverage and a spread - isn’t there ?

Don't change the subject.

So the buyer makes maybe 2$ times 4 minus 20% spread.... and because the buyer (as the seller) is most probably an institution that doesn’t work with it’s own capital it’s minus some more percent for interests.

You're funny! $12-$10=$2, $10-$12= -$2.

It’s not the 2 dollar back and forth

LOL!

26 posted on 01/21/2008 9:15:52 AM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists so bad at math?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Rummenigge
By selling back and forth the banks ‘earn’ a lot of money.

We're not talking about the banks or the brokers, we're talking about the buyers and sellers of options.

27 posted on 01/21/2008 9:20:11 AM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists so bad at math?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

So that’s what you want tot talk about ?

What’s up with them ?


28 posted on 01/22/2008 12:09:24 AM PST by Rummenigge (there are people willing to blow out the light because it casts a shadow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Rummenigge
So that’s what you want tot talk about ?

What?

What’s up with them ?

Them?

29 posted on 01/22/2008 6:09:27 AM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists so bad at math?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

yup


30 posted on 01/22/2008 7:11:47 AM PST by Rummenigge (there are people willing to blow out the light because it casts a shadow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Rummenigge

Try asking your questions again, in English.


31 posted on 01/22/2008 7:12:35 AM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists so bad at math?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Rummenigge

There’s nothing wrong with “oil dependency” - why do you think it’s on the planet in the first place? (for us to USE)

The problem is that the enviros won’t let us use our OWN oil, and are basically Luddites who want everyone (except themselves) to have a reduced lifestyle.


32 posted on 01/22/2008 7:14:21 AM PST by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MrB

lol yeah that’s correct - and they don’t want nuclear energy either.

But isn’t it a good strategy to suck the middle east dry and THEN go to domestic resources ?

Or safe them for the chemical industry - if economically feasable ?

I understood that taking the oil out of the sand in saudi arabia is much cheaper as it was with US domestic resources.


33 posted on 01/22/2008 7:20:26 AM PST by Rummenigge (there are people willing to blow out the light because it casts a shadow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

Here’s help for you:

http://www.starfall.com/


34 posted on 01/22/2008 7:22:33 AM PST by Rummenigge (there are people willing to blow out the light because it casts a shadow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Rummenigge

Tell me again how people make money trading options, that was funny!


35 posted on 01/22/2008 7:26:39 AM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists so bad at math?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Rummenigge
But isn’t it a good strategy to suck the middle east dry and THEN go to domestic resources ?

This is a good point. Is that the strategy? Maybe, and good. We ARE enriching the Islamists by doing this, though. But, like any stupid businessmen (dot com bubble anyone?), they aren't protecting their cashflow. Once the oil is gone, so is their wealth - back to wandering the desert on camels. Seriously, the Islamists are the biggest threat to civilization. They want their "peace", which consists of a Global Islamist caliphate in which all people are either Muslim, Dhimmi, or DEAD.

36 posted on 01/22/2008 7:28:16 AM PST by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

Oh for crying out loud - you know all that.

If you are in desperate need of soy beans - you would like to buy some. You can buy the beans - the transport of the beans, the packaging of the beans, the handling of the beans, fees for this and that inbetween - but you are not finished with that - you also have to purchase a certain amount of options in advance - because if you don’t maybe the chineese come along and buy them on the day you need them for a really ridiculous high price - that’s because they got to get rid of their greenback (see the actions of the fed today to know why)

So you have to buy options because you do want to tell those who give you the money to opperate your business how you manage your risks - otherwise they go elsewhere.

So these options are ment as an insurance. Only this insurance is traded on high volume in a highly inflational way by hedgefonds and institutions who don’t need the beans as such nor do they need a beanpriceinsurance (please forgive me my german tendcy to merge words)

So each and everyone in the soy bean dealing business is certianly not dealing with your 2 dollars back and forth - to purchase beans you got to pay more then the beans.

Of course your national monkey for calculating a fake but accurate rate of inflation will only account for the price of soy as such. But that’s not relevant anymore for business. It’s the TOC of the bean that matters :)

But hey - you DO know that. How’s your BOA stocks today ?

(Sorry I was in that mood)


37 posted on 01/22/2008 7:37:23 AM PST by Rummenigge (there are people willing to blow out the light because it casts a shadow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Rummenigge

ahh for pete’s sake the TCO not the TOC - but hey I am taking away your fun - so you go on...


38 posted on 01/22/2008 7:38:01 AM PST by Rummenigge (there are people willing to blow out the light because it casts a shadow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: MrB

In the moment they are helping to hold up your banks.

Their money works in the US since always. It’s like in the old times of slave trade - they sell out their assets (like african chiefs sold their own people) and you (like the portuguese then) take the future benefits.

And certainly you protect them from each other (no they are not all the same). Protection is quite expensive if it has to come from the outside (classical italian business)


39 posted on 01/22/2008 7:43:25 AM PST by Rummenigge (there are people willing to blow out the light because it casts a shadow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Rummenigge
Buying futures for delivery is different than your original claim that the option traders were making all the money.

How’s your BOA stocks today ?

It's up.

40 posted on 01/22/2008 7:46:15 AM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists so bad at math?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson