Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Best Buy's Geek Squad Finds Child Porn on Janitor's Computer, Janitor Arrested
Switched ^ | 1/16/08 | Terrence O'Brien

Posted on 01/17/2008 6:03:54 PM PST by Teflonic

Best Buy's Geek Squad isn't exactly known for respecting people's property. This time, however, instead of us catching them, they caught a guy with child porn.

A middle school custodian sent in a hard drive back in August of 2007 to recover lost data. Upon performing their usual search (and invasion of personal privacy), the Geek Squadders at a Twin Cities location found over 800 images of young girls between the ages of 7 and 15 in various states of undress and performing sexual acts. The Geek Squad promptly turned the evidence over to the police. The police eventually obtained a search warrant and -- upon execution -- found more evidence in the janitor's home.

While we would like to say that this guy is sick and deserves whatever punishment he gets, we are disturbed by the conduct of Geek Squad employees who seem to make it a habit of going through customer data. Whether or not the data is illegal and leads to arrest, warrantless searches by non-law-enforcement personnel is disturbing on an ethical level and we're pretty sure unconstitutional.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: bestbuy; geeksquad; porn; privacy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-144 next last
There is a poll at the story link asking "Despite what they found, did Best Buy overstep privacy boundaries?" that actually has more yes votes ugh.
1 posted on 01/17/2008 6:03:55 PM PST by Teflonic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Teflonic

If in the process of recovering your data they stumbled onto your financial records and gave them a nice long glance would you not be angry at their perusement of your data?


2 posted on 01/17/2008 6:08:30 PM PST by TheZMan (Vote Conservative in '08. Vote for Fred Thompson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Teflonic

Think of it this way. If the janitor wasn’t into child porn, the “Geek Squad” people would still have been rummaging through his personal files. Are you okay with that?


3 posted on 01/17/2008 6:08:33 PM PST by bshomoic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Teflonic

Good for the Geeks!


4 posted on 01/17/2008 6:08:37 PM PST by SouthTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Teflonic

The guy is an idiot. Private searches are not unconstiutional. Best Buy is not an agency of the government.


5 posted on 01/17/2008 6:08:59 PM PST by tdewey10 (Can we please take out iran's nuclear capability before they start using it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Teflonic

Good on ‘em!!
If this a**hole wanted his privacy he could have protected it by not sticking his sick perversion into a public marketplace for which he chose to pay.
I hope this Mother****er ends up in chemical castration.


6 posted on 01/17/2008 6:11:37 PM PST by acapesket (never had a vote count in all my years here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bshomoic
did they break into his house or did he turn over his computer to them in order for them to perform a service? and in the performing of that service, they found this stuff.

this is in now way an illegal search.

"here, take my stuff and fix it, but don't look at it!"

silly.

7 posted on 01/17/2008 6:12:10 PM PST by thefactor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Teflonic
...warrantless searches by non-law-enforcement personnel is disturbing on an ethical level and we're pretty sure unconstitutional.

This is scary. Doesn't this guy know that the constitution only protects people from the government? The constitution has no effect on the geek squad or any other private entity. They provided probable cause for the government to obtain a warrant, the same as if you had overheard others planning a crime and turned them in.

8 posted on 01/17/2008 6:12:20 PM PST by Wingy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bshomoic; TheZMan

The expectation of privacy ends where? The man was no longer in possession of his data, in essence, he handed it to someone else.


9 posted on 01/17/2008 6:12:29 PM PST by SouthTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Teflonic

I’m glad the Geek Squad did the right thing and turn this idiot over to the police.


10 posted on 01/17/2008 6:12:29 PM PST by Traveler59 (Truth is a journey, not a destination.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Teflonic

Anyone who takes a computer to Best Buy with a full hard drive deserves to have their head examined.

One should expect that eveything in your hard drive is open to being looked at and copied.


11 posted on 01/17/2008 6:13:15 PM PST by txzman (Jer 23:29)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Teflonic

Not a good idea to give your hard drive to anyone unless you are willing for them to see everything on it.


12 posted on 01/17/2008 6:13:18 PM PST by Hattie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tdewey10

That pretty well sums it up. Take your car to the shop with a kilo of cocaine under the seat and claim “invasion of privacy” when it’s found. See how far that’ll get ya. :)


13 posted on 01/17/2008 6:13:40 PM PST by L98Fiero (A fool who'll waste his life, God rest his guts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Teflonic
middle school custodian

These creepy scumbags always try to situate themselves in amongst children. They never seem content just to look at pictures, which is disgusting enough. He was no doubt up to no good and with equally little doubt was actually targeting children for hands-on molestation. Bravo for the Geek Squad! They almost surely saved one or more kids from being molested by this perverted pig.

14 posted on 01/17/2008 6:17:07 PM PST by LibWhacker (Democrats are phony Americans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SouthTexas
The expectation of privacy ends where? The man was no longer in possession of his data, in essence, he handed it to someone else.

This isn't about whether the guy skates on the child porn charge or not. Best Buy is not a state actor, so anything they do has no affect on the charges. However, is it ethical for Best Buy to rummage through someone's hard drive? I'm no techie, so I don't know. The question I guess is whether they need to go through the hard drive to do their job and just came by this by accident or do they routinely look through peoples' hard drives for a few laughs and maybe to mine personal data.

15 posted on 01/17/2008 6:17:10 PM PST by bshomoic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: bshomoic

A car mechanic finds a stash of child porn pics in the trunk of a car as he replaces a burnt out tail light. By your standard he shouldn’t report it?


16 posted on 01/17/2008 6:17:55 PM PST by csvset
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

To: TheZMan

If my financial records were proof of a felony then sure the techs should report it. What’s wrong with private citizens reporting crimes?
If you have sensitive data it should be kept in an encrypted folder or in offline storage.
If your car is being serviced and the mechanic notices a kilo of cocaine in the trunk should he not report it because he had no business opening your trunk?


18 posted on 01/17/2008 6:21:16 PM PST by Teflonic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Teflonic

Years ago when I worked in a photo lab in lauderdale if we came across perverted stuff we ran it by the man.....probly the same thing......I guess in the small print some where you are giving consent when you hand the film/hard drive over.


19 posted on 01/17/2008 6:21:19 PM PST by CGASMIA68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bshomoic
It depends. A tech might pop open a few of the files they recovered to make sure they recovered correctly and intact, or it might have been impossible to miss, or... etc.

I don't see it as much different as handing one's 35mm film over to a photo lab for development.

In both cases, the technician would most likely be obligated by law to report something of this nature to the authorities if they uncover it. The key point is one can't trust them not to rummage through the data, if that's an issue, then use someone that is trusted or learn how to do it and eliminate the middleman.

20 posted on 01/17/2008 6:21:37 PM PST by DaisyCutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-144 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson