Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Teflonic

Think of it this way. If the janitor wasn’t into child porn, the “Geek Squad” people would still have been rummaging through his personal files. Are you okay with that?


3 posted on 01/17/2008 6:08:33 PM PST by bshomoic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: bshomoic
did they break into his house or did he turn over his computer to them in order for them to perform a service? and in the performing of that service, they found this stuff.

this is in now way an illegal search.

"here, take my stuff and fix it, but don't look at it!"

silly.

7 posted on 01/17/2008 6:12:10 PM PST by thefactor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: bshomoic; TheZMan

The expectation of privacy ends where? The man was no longer in possession of his data, in essence, he handed it to someone else.


9 posted on 01/17/2008 6:12:29 PM PST by SouthTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: bshomoic

A car mechanic finds a stash of child porn pics in the trunk of a car as he replaces a burnt out tail light. By your standard he shouldn’t report it?


16 posted on 01/17/2008 6:17:55 PM PST by csvset
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: bshomoic

Not really but the Geek Squad is never going to have a chance to go through my personal files because I am my own geek squad.


69 posted on 01/17/2008 7:15:57 PM PST by pepperhead (Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: bshomoic; TheZMan

If the PC were sent in to have Office installed, I’d agree with you, but the task at hand was data recovery, so it would seem reasonable to look at at least a representative sample to see if it was in fact getting recovered. If they stumbled on evidence of illegal activity in the process of doing an otherwise reasonable inspection, I don’t think it wrong that they should turn it over to the cops.


100 posted on 01/17/2008 8:54:42 PM PST by Still Thinking (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: bshomoic

First, the Constitution is an agreement between the government and the governed. The Constitution is not a code of conduct between private citizens. This is not a Constitutional issue.

Second, when you give your files, computer or otherwise to someone else, you should assume that you have no privacy interest in those files, unless you have a specific non-disclosure agreement with that party. Why do you think there is so much litigation and so many rules governing your medical records.

Finally, the devastating damage that is done to your privacy every day by insurance and credit companies makes this pale in comparison. If the government continues to make inroads into governing health care, then we will have a Constitutional Issue.


142 posted on 01/19/2008 4:29:24 AM PST by Steamburg (Your wallet speaks the only language most politicians understand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson