Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/17/2008 3:58:29 PM PST by ShadowDancer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: ShadowDancer

With FIOS coming to a lot of places around the country? Good luck with that, TW.


2 posted on 01/17/2008 4:00:47 PM PST by perfect_rovian_storm (Yeah, I'm a bigot. I'm bigoted against MA liberals pretending to be conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ShadowDancer
Sounds like a tax on porn.

It's un-American.

4 posted on 01/17/2008 4:03:22 PM PST by billorites (freepo ergo sum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ShadowDancer
This guy is gonna hate it.


5 posted on 01/17/2008 4:07:03 PM PST by Rb ver. 2.0 (Global warming is the new Marxism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ShadowDancer
Time Warner needs to hire a competent marketing person.

If I choose to purchase more cars, or more lumber, or more of a zillion other things, the company selling to me rolls out the red carpet, thanks me extra for my business, and goes a little out of their way to make me feel special. They also charge me more in total, of course, than the customer who buys just one car, or just one sheet of plywood or just one of whatever. One hundred cars costs more than one car ... how else could it be. But the per car cost goes down a bit, for bulk purchases.

The high volume customer is valued, more highly.

So here comes Time Warner, trying to make it sound like they are going to penalize the high volume customer with punitive penalty fees, "for the sake of the little guy." The damn liberals must have run the common sense capitalist businessmen out of Time Warner. They got the message all backwards.

Even the electric power company, though liberal around the edges with their green environmentalist propaganda, is at heart capitalist -- the more electricity I use, the more I pay -- fair deal. True, the per-kilowatt cost tends to rise with usage, not shrink, but at least they don't go out of their way to punish you (unlike the Cell Phone company did, when my teen age son discovered text messaging, for example.)

9 posted on 01/17/2008 4:15:26 PM PST by ThePythonicCow (The Greens and Reds steal in fear of freedom and capitalism; Fear arising from a lack of Faith.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ShadowDancer

Time Warner? Their cable Tv is OK BUT my AT&T hi speed connection (yes, the same AT&T that wants to “peak” at your “illegal” downloads) is great, so I can bet $$$$ that subscribers will be leaving TW ISP for the competition.

Reminds me of my family members in Canada who are being monitored (and sometimes “capped”) by Bell due to “excessive” donwloads.


15 posted on 01/17/2008 4:32:17 PM PST by max americana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ShadowDancer

I download about 200 Gigs a month on my FIOS, and I am not even trying.

I can download an entire 5 gig DVD in less than 40 minutes.

Metered rates. Fat chance. Cry me a river Time Warner.


17 posted on 01/17/2008 4:35:14 PM PST by Smogger (It's the WOT Stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ShadowDancer

Time Warner is trying to make up revenue, lost when people get a chance to rid themselves of the TW monopoly.

Verizon laid fiber optic lines, and almost everybody in my neighborhood is switching from TW cable, to FIOS.

And it is NOT mainly about technology. It IS mainly because Time Warner (remember AOL Time Warner) is such a lousy company to deal with.

It is a classic example of what goes around, comes around.

My internet is more reliable than TW, but the same speed. My phone is unchanged, but the TV is way better.


22 posted on 01/17/2008 4:45:08 PM PST by truth_seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ShadowDancer

Metered rates? Ha.

Using their logic, I should be paying according the the percentage of my [purchased] rated bandwidth I am receiving.

I’m paying my cable net provider (not TW) for 6 megs down. I should be able to get 85% of that. For two months my throughput has dropped to .75-1.5 megs EVERY night from approximately 7: to 10:45. Right at quarter to 11 it jumps right back up to 5.3 megs. And they just can’t figure it out (major sarcasm).

Thus TW should charge a customer based on their real throughput, not on their “rated” throughput, if one were to make a logical extension of their reasoning.

In reality, logic has nothing to do with it. They will get what the market will bear, if there is competition, or what their monopoly permits if they have greased the right palms.


27 posted on 01/17/2008 5:17:23 PM PST by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s........you weren't really there)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ShadowDancer; AT7Saluki
...charging customers based on how much data they download...

What's next? Charging per show watched? Hey, those rabbit ears will soon come in handy! (And they don't effect global warming!)

38 posted on 01/18/2008 4:12:18 PM PST by Libloather (Do animals pollute the planet by exhaling, too?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ShadowDancer

I talked to a cousin who lives in Beaumont, he said RR is pretty much the only game in town, that in large parts of the area, RR is the only broadband option. He thinks that was probably why Beaumont was chosen, since in other markets, people would flee for another carrier as soon as they got wind of it.


45 posted on 01/20/2008 6:52:18 AM PST by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson