And that relates in what way to my point that an either/or presentation to young people, where either the Bible is true, or evolution is true, will lead at least some of them to reject their faith?
If they reject creation ex nihilo as found in the Bible, then they are far more likely to reject the rest of the gospel message, including the resurrection. Perhaps you should be asking this question of the Evos who say if evolution is true, then the Bible can't be true???
Well, here's what you said back at #56 to jeddavis:
That's an easy thing to say if you think that anything you personally don't accept isn't "science".See, the way this works here at FR is you make a point about something, and then the rest of us are free to support it or challenge it. Your point, it seemed to me, was that evolution was "science" and and that jeddavis didn't really understand what "science" was. So I thought it only natural to ask you what you thought "science" was since here I am, with my nearly ancient BS & MS degrees from RPI, thinking that evolution is no more "science" than is creationism or Gorebaloney. So I just thought it natural to ask what you meant by "science."
ML/NJ