Don’t know why I was pinged.
But since you pinged me, I will just point out that your posted English translation failed to address the points brought up by Mrs. Don-o. For example, do you have evidence that “MALOKOIS” AND “ARSENOKOITAI” apply beyond the pagan-temple prostitutes?
On shorter threads, If I’m making a broader comment,
I try to ping all of the posters in the conversation.
[... do you have evidence that MALOKOIS AND ARSENOKOITAI apply beyond the pagan-temple prostitutes? ...]
If this is a justification for Christians to indulge
homosexual deviancy, then you may as well apply it to
all sexual perversions, including beastiality.
I must ask if there is any consideration that sex of
any kind outside of marriage is fornication?
I must also ask if there is any consideration that sex
of any kind with a partner other than your spouse is
adultery?
Thus... whatever ones sexual practices, whether
justified Scripturally or not, there still remains the
sin of adultery and fornication to consider.