In MI nobody under 15% will get one delegate. Fred was at 5%. It was pretty clear that your vote was going to do your candidate no good, but it did help McCain. But, like you said... it’s your perogative.
So would you have voted for Fred if the roles were reversed? Or would you stay loyal to Mitt?
This young man from MO is getting educated by Mark. One at a time, this is great.
No Huck voter here after this call....
MOgirl
This coming from someone who lives in CA. Talk about a meaningless vote.
So I should vote for your candidate, cause you think so? How cute is that?
During the "off" years, we hear over and over again, how the primaries are the time to vote for who you want, or for the true "conservatives", because that is what there purpose is, yet when people say that they voted for who they want, or in this case the "conservative" they get slammed anyway!
I am by no means a Fred supporter, and many here will be surprised at my sticking up for his fans, but let the voters vote their conscience! Don't shame them into thinking that what they did was wrong. Please, I beg of you all! RatsDawg, and others have supported Fred for a long time, and they deserve the right to vote for him (for maybe the only time) without getting hassled. We can do the wheeling and dealing, begging and consoling after the nominee is picked, this is the time to vote your wants, not your don't wants.
I also tend to wonder why it is looked so badly upon when John McCain gets crossover votes (ie. voters that may or may not support him, but voting strategically) yet it is encouraged for Mitt to get votes the same way?