Posted on 01/15/2008 12:16:34 PM PST by grellis
You know, a lot of conservatives around here are getting sick of the insults. We don’t recall appointing you the ariter of who “true” conservatives are or are not.
Fox had a love affair going with John McCain and Mitt beat up on their boy. Smooooooch...
Then you wont mind a black man
Or a Moslem..
Sorry, but you’re way off. You’re ignoring one simple fact:
THE DEM NOMINEE IS GOING TO BE HILLARY CLINTON.
50% of the population will not vote for her. Never, no-way, now-how. She could run against the Unabomber and her MAX vote possibility is 50%.
So she MIGHT be able to win, but it’s very unlikely. Add to that the fact that many black Dems are going to be ticked off that Barak Hussein didn’t get the nod?
Hillary CAN’T win.
Hank
I am not sure what is going on with Fox, they have been sounding more like CNN lately.
Well, excuuuuuse me!
FNC may be the biggest loser of this primary season.
And, excuuuuse me some more!
They want Queeg and probably figure Romney is his biggest threat.
So McCain says, but if that's true, why the friendship with Kennedy? :)
Mark Levin was critical of the Fox coverage over at NRO. Not sure why their enthusiasm for Huck and McCain isn’t there for Romney.
I can only imagine Mitt on the stage with Hillary:
“Washington is broken and its standing right next to me.”
Mitt Romney won overwhelmingly amongst conservatives. It’s time to get optimittstic!
Yes to that. Romney is a good man. McCain is a broken man. And Huck is another flimflam man from Arkansas.
What if it’s John Edwards against Mitt Romney or Fred Thompson? Would that be a Dem or Republican win?
The media is spastic about Hillary and Obama right now, but they might not even be the candidates in the end...especially if Hillary implodes or says what she is REALLY thinking about Obama.
This has to be the lamest Candidates in the lamest Debate I have ever seen.
Honey, speak for yourself. I love Mitt, and I have voted for 1 or 2 dems since 1972,never for president.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2008_Republican_presidential_primaries
http://www.thegreenpapers.com/P08/tally.phtml
These are my sources. The second source shows michigan is WINNER TAKE ALL by district AND STATEWIDE.
Look it up for yourself.
Thank you so much for the concise explanation. Much appreciated.
Remember, we're watching hard-nosed, big league politics, not amatuers posting on a political forum.
No winning GOP candidate would pick an Arkysaw Elmer Gantry, from a state with few electoral votes, a populist with few big money contacts for donations, someone who would inspire few independents, and most of all, an amnesty lover.
However, I hope that neither McQueeg or Huckleberry get into a position where they have to select a VP running mate......each other or someone else.
IMO, this is one quinella that will never leave the gate.
Leni
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.