Fine. But don’t react to people who disagree with your assessment that their views somehow constitute Marxism.
I could care less if Rudy gets to talk to a crowd. I am concerned that ill-advised protests will set back the cause of life.
Do you join me in that concern? I realize in this instance you and I disagree on what constitutes an ill-advised protest, but as a matter of principle, are you also against ill-advised protests?
And could you possibly refrain from YELLING? Sort of like the problem some of us have with the protests under discussion-—some can’t help but become rude at the drop of a hat.
Thank you.
Your comment to me, out of the box, categorized me as someone from DU.
Your comment to me, out of the box, was in my response to being told by someone later banned that First Amendment rights did not “allow” protests such as this....which you then tried to twist into something altogether different than to what started the entire discussion.
I hardly think that three words, in all caps, sprinkled about my numerous posts constitutes YELLING.
What would you have people do? Rudi seems to care less about this. That's not quite true. He's in favor of it.
There was a time when Christ, Himself, became less than "gentlemanly" in His displeasure with sin. It concerned the moneychangers at the temple. And his anger was fast and furious. If callous disregard concerning infanticide cannot justify severe displeasure with a politician, what can?
What would you have people do.....when it appears that the immorality of infanticide falls on deaf ears?
“I could care less if Rudy gets to talk to a crowd. I am concerned that ill-advised protests will set back the cause of life.”
__________________________________________________________
There is no “cause of life”
Abortion on demand has not changed one bit ...even a decrease to one government sanction abortion is one death too many and still not a “cause of life”
A “cause of life” would be NO unborn children dying by abortion...
It’s fine for you to get on your high horse and tell us to be quiet, but you offer no other remedies for the halt to the slaughter of 1/3 of the generations...
You appear to be a hot head and yet you accuse the wonderful young men in Florida of much the same type of behavior...
I do not know what your problem is...if you really are pro-life then you should gather with us and not attempt to scatter the flock...
Due to fractions in the pro-life movement in it’s fedgeling days, little was accomplished...We didnt stand up as Americans with free speech rights...
Rather we listened to the Christian leadership of the time who claimed as the “Silent Majority” we would see all things righted...
God was waiting for us to do something though...it is the squeeky wheel that gets oiled not the smooth sounding one...
The pro-abortion crowds came out each year in their 100s of thousands, while we would have a few huinderd at best...
When fighting against abortion was finally sanctioned by the Christians as other than a “Catholic issue” the abortion crowd were years down the road in front of us...
Being a “silent majority” has not worked...
I appreciate those young men and respect them for what they are trying to do...I respect anyone who will fight against abortion...
Gulianni has a foothold in Florida...he has spent more money and more time there and has a larger following thamn most of the other states...
For Gulianni, Florida may well be the make or break state...it is full of ex-New Yorkers who went there to retire etc, and the politics of many of the rest echo Gulianni’s stances..
As for a president who will fight against abortion, only Duncan Hunter has a proven record....
We know that Duncan will fight abortion because he has in the past...
And we know that Gulianni has no reason to change his pro-abortion politics after he ever got into office...