Posted on 01/12/2008 2:09:13 AM PST by chessplayer
Insisting he's “not a conspiracy theorist,” Bill Maher, on the Friday night season debut of his HBO show, suggested that because Republicans prefer to run against Hillary Clinton than Barack Obama they engineered her victory in New Hampshire's Democratic primary.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...
Yet another voice questioning Hillary!’s win in NH. Seems like nobody thinks she won it fair and square, no matter what their theory is.
Those evil election stealing Republicans are stealing elections for Democrats now too!
It’s all part of a vast right wing conspiracy.
lol, wut?
Ping the Snowflakes. :)
Rove! You magnificent bastard!
“Who profits from the Hillary victory? They don't want to run against Obama. Your party does not want to run against him. They want to run against Hillary Clinton and now they have a race with her in it.”
Why Republicans let themselves be used by Maher, Colbert, Stewart etc... is why Republican opinion enters the box with an 0-2 count. They stroll on like flunkies for pie-throwing targets.
Hey, Tony! What're you doing on this nut loser's show? Maher is a first class moron and conspiracy freak.
As for Catherine Cryer, I lost all respect for her waaaay back in 1990 during Desert Shield, when she jumped on the "no blood for oil bandwagon" and actually said during one of her interviews on CNN with a rent-a-colonel that the Iraqi army wholly outclassed the U.S. Army.
What a twit!
Ping to #9
He’s right, he is not a conspiracy theorist. He is, however, a moron.
What a fool. As if any party can predict how a race will go so far ahead of time, and put the effort in to get a candidate who could blow their man out of the water.
Obama could possibly be the least-qualified person to run for the presidency in the last century. Why the GOP would work to pick between these two, either of which could be a huge winner or a nonstarter depending on so many elements, I don't know.
Nice to see Tony Snow looking so well.
And this guy gets paid to be on TV?
I suggest that Maher either isn't a conspiracy theorists and is nuts--or he is a conspiracy theorist and is nuts.
Talking about conspiracies, what about Tony Snow and his buddies at Fox changing the rules to keep Duncan Hunter out of the debates? Keeping Hunter out of the debates seems to be newsworthy enough that you would expect other news outlets to at least condemn them. National talk shows will not even mention Duncan Hunter and even my local talk show hosts will not mention him while at the same time tell us not to let the MSM choose our next president.
I read the L.A. Times, the L.A. Daily news, the Ventura county Star, The Orange County Register, I listen to Imus, Macintyre In the morning, O’Reily or Rush, Hannity and then Larry Elder or John and Ken. Nobody but Glenn Beck will mention Duncan Hunter.
If Obama is their choice, the left will throw down the racial card every time someone questions his record or his experience.
It’s not all that hard to figure out. The left looks for every possible way to claim victim if only to get a “head start.
And you can take that to the bank.
I’m surprised I’m reading this thread. Its truly astonishing anybody would bother watching this show.
very, very, very
few
americans have heard of
duncan hunter.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.