Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: syriacus

I would have liked to seen it, and it wouldn’t have spawned the level of vitriol that we see in these posts among supporters of different candidates, since the primaries were so distant at that time.

I really think it would have brought ALL the issues to the forefront.

Once the issues were defined, we could go forward with a coherent Republican agenda, that all of us can get behind.

Even now, I think it would allow US to define who we are, what we stand for, and what we have in mind for the future of the country. The “who wins/loses” thing really isn’t important to me. WE (the voters) LOSE so long as the MSM, and pundits define us.

IMO, right now our message is muddled and undefined, while the Democrats are running on a single, unified platform (albeit one based on air).


126 posted on 01/11/2008 7:17:39 AM PST by RangerM (Jesus was likely a very good carpenter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies ]


To: RangerM
I really think it would have brought ALL the issues to the forefront.

But wasn't "our failure in Iraq" the main topic then?

Who would have refereed the debate?

130 posted on 01/11/2008 7:29:48 AM PST by syriacus (It's hard to say when we will see -- a Lib as glib as Huckabee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson