Yes, and I told you a billion times why and you still keep bringing this stupid feces up. Paul wasn't in the race then. Rudy didn't make a big deal out of social issues (when I wasn't aware how liberal he was on them) and I thought he'd be a better at downsizing government.
and now you support the paleosurrendermonkey and so your particular judgment as to whom you might vote for has no relevance to conservatives.
No I support Paul because he's talking about limited government and abolishing the IRS and getting us out of the UN and he doesn't wear his religion on his sleeve. He at least supports border security and a strong national defense, which is good enough for me. Any terrorists state that attacks us will be DEAD.
You have twice disqualified yourself from the status of conservative. Maybe after a rest of about four years at Happy Acres Rest Home, you might become conservative enough to venture an opinion again.
Who made you Judge, Jury, and Executioner?
We do not need a Conservative Party any more than we need a libertarian party (other than to drag the moonbats away from the GOP).
Uh, I never advocated such bub, that was in response to another poster who brought it up.
Your intended refusal to vote GOP in November will not cripple whatever candidate is actually nominated (and we all know to an absolute certainty that paleoPaulie will NOT be that candidate, now don't we, since the only voters now are the real ones and the pipsqueak is being serially demolished as was his obvious fate.
Good! So you have nothing to worry about then, right? You don't need my measly vote anyway, or the votes of Paul supporters who have finally woken up and started talking about the Constitution again. If McCain, Huckster, or Giuliani is the nominee, I am staying home or writing in Paul's name.
You have a problem with religion??? That would equate with your prior support of the thrice married cross-dressing babykiller Julie Annie and your support of do nothing Paulie who wants to punt on pro-life and lavender perversion posing as "marriage", while hiding behind his curiously perverse notions of the constitution; which will also mean taxpayer-supported "partner" benefits though the paleopipsqueak is sure to deny it. People here are entitled to be reminded of your prior track record of bad judgments.
El Run Paulie could not limit government or abolish the IRS or do anything else. A Paul presidency would be an exercise in absolute futility as he would not get 10% of the Republicans in Congress to vote for his moonbat delusions.
It seems rather likely that your vote will join your brain where the sun shineth not.
44 years of conservative activism and leadership make me your judge, jury and executioner. Off with your head!