Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dragnet2
So the short answer is you have no means to communicate with the citizens in your region for immediate status reports and other vital information in the event of a major disaster. OK

OK?

What are you suggesting?

Are you advocating that Mitt Romney, as president, should use Federal resources for your State and local communications?

Where in the Constitution does it even suggest that the Federal government should even be interested in what your State of local community does in this regard, or God forbid, fund it!

Why don't you ask Fred the same question. He's a Federalist, like Romney is. I know what the answer will be.

What the hell has happened to conservatives since 9/11???

When is this going to stop???

138 posted on 01/10/2008 2:51:55 PM PST by Cold Heat (Mitt....2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies ]


To: Cold Heat
OK? What are you suggesting?

I wasn't suggesting anything. You quoted what I stated and my point, which I again post below, is quite clear:

>>So the short answer is you have no means to communicate with the citizens in your region for immediate status reports and other vital information in the event of a major disaster. OK<<

152 posted on 01/10/2008 4:16:19 PM PST by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies ]

To: Cold Heat
Are you advocating that Mitt Romney, as president, should use Federal resources for your State and local communications?

Mitt ALREADY DID THAT in MA. He used Department of Homeland securty funding (as did many other governors) to shore up failing communications. I personally haven't a problem with that, and I doubt any one else does in LIGHT of 9-11. I'm pointing very simply to one fact. His remarks belie his thinking on such things. Regardless of the amount of money spent on a fixed infrastructure to put it IN, it will, in time fail. And invariably it will fail at the WORST POSSIBLE TIME when it is NEEDED THE MOST. To write off ham radio operators as "not needed" is flippant and ignorant. It's apparently IN HIS NATURE to do such things. THIS IS the point of this thread. Not trying to hide things he did, or imply he did something else, or point a finger at this poster or that, and try to say someone is saying "something other than what they are saying". And this isn't about Fred or other Candidates. It's about Romney's failure.
173 posted on 01/11/2008 7:07:55 AM PST by Rick.Donaldson (http://www.transasianaxis.com - Visit for lastest on DPRK/Russia/China/Etc --Fred Thompson for Prez.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson