Skip to comments.
The atheist's daughter
Chicago Tribune ^
| January 10, 2008
| Nara Schoenberg
Posted on 01/10/2008 11:21:05 AM PST by Borges
The No. 2 atheist activist in Illinois doesn't have an office or a car.
Reporters have been banned from her home -- her mother is adamant on this point -- so the McDonald's across the street from Buffalo Grove High School has to serve as her impromptu media headquarters.
None of which is surprising, when you consider that Dawn Sherman is all of 14.
Her lawsuit challenging the new Silent Reflection and Student Prayer Act in Illinois has already resulted in a temporary injunction blocking the law's mandatory moment of silence for the 13,000 students in Township High School District 214. Now, she and the No. 1 atheist activist in Illinois -- her father, Rob -- are going after a bigger prize: They want the law struck down as unconstitutional.
During a wide-ranging after-school interview, the girl at the center of the legal battle proves quieter and more measured than her outspoken father, but no less spirited and determined.
"She's a rugged individualist, and I say that in the most positive way," says Dennis Northway, Dawn's former middle school choir director, who once jokingly suggested to Dawn that she should sing in his madrigal choir at Grace Episcopal Church in Oak Park -- and was shocked when she took him up on the offer.
(Excerpt) Read more at chicagotribune.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: antichristian; antitheism; atheismandstate; messydivorce
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-67 next last
Teen atheist Dawn Sherman, seen preparing for a choir rehearsal, is fighting the state's new Silent Reflection and Student Prayer Act in court. Her lawsuit, which resulted in a temporary injunction blocking the law's enforcement in her school district, is "entirely about me and my rights," she says.
1
posted on
01/10/2008 11:21:06 AM PST
by
Borges
To: Borges
entirely about me and my rights," she says
What about the rights of others to freely practice their religion? I seem to recall something in the constitution about that.
2
posted on
01/10/2008 11:23:27 AM PST
by
faloi
To: Borges
She’ll make a really good little goose-stepper, protecting people from too much freedom
3
posted on
01/10/2008 11:23:54 AM PST
by
AppyPappy
(If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
To: Borges
"entirely about me and my rights," She won't get very far with that attitude.
4
posted on
01/10/2008 11:24:20 AM PST
by
ShadowAce
(Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
To: Borges
Her right to insist that the others not be observant with a moment of silence. It seems that she’s trying to force her faith in a world of “no god” on everyone else.
There is to be no establishment nor prohibition on religion. We are talking about the same “space” for establishing and prohibiting.
5
posted on
01/10/2008 11:24:44 AM PST
by
weegee
(Those who surrender personal liberty to lower global temperatures will receive neither.)
To: Borges
People have some serious God Issues in this country.
6
posted on
01/10/2008 11:24:49 AM PST
by
PureSolace
(God save us all)
To: Borges
She can’t even shut up for a minute?
7
posted on
01/10/2008 11:25:10 AM PST
by
Hegemony Cricket
(Although most dead people vote democrat, aborted babies, if given the choice, would vote Republican.)
To: Borges
People opposing this have been quoted in the newspaper as saying that the act is a stalking horse to get prayer back in the public schools. IIRC, the Supreme Court banned prayer led by someone at the school. I doubt that voluntary private prayer that is not led by anyone is unconstitutional, and there’s also no provision in the law that forces anyone to pray at all.
8
posted on
01/10/2008 11:25:12 AM PST
by
RonF
To: Borges
already a productive member of society....imagine when she’ll have to work.
9
posted on
01/10/2008 11:26:11 AM PST
by
sappy
To: PureSolace
10
posted on
01/10/2008 11:26:13 AM PST
by
BibChr
("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
To: RonF
Meanwhile schools are establishing Islamic prayer rooms and permitting those students to break for the daytime calls to prayer.
11
posted on
01/10/2008 11:26:37 AM PST
by
weegee
(Those who surrender personal liberty to lower global temperatures will receive neither.)
To: AppyPappy
Shell make a really good little goose-stepper, protecting people from too much freedom No, I don't think so. Imagine her shock, 20 years hence, when she realizes that God was really there all the time. This is her dad talking -- she'll come around.
12
posted on
01/10/2008 11:26:48 AM PST
by
r9etb
To: Borges
Isn't it amazing how a moment of silence can shake the very foundation of an atheist.
13
posted on
01/10/2008 11:27:50 AM PST
by
svcw
(There is no plan B.)
To: faloi
I am about as Christian as you get and I think that schooltime for prayers is a bad idea. Heck, I thought any "introspection time" or whatever PC way they talked about it was a huge waste when I was in middle and high school. I got my prayers done the night before or in the morning and I was at school to learn.
Same thing with the pledge of allegiance, which is a totally absurd anachronism. Take that 10-20 minutes wasted in the morning and put it towards extra time in American history courses or theology electives.
To: AppyPappy
Future Hillary of America.
To: Borges
Yep, she’s not a believer alright . . .”It’s all about me . .”
Fast forward to her Judgment Day and hear her saying that.
To: svcw
Maybe she should use the moment of silence to reflect upon what a self-absorbed brat she is.
17
posted on
01/10/2008 11:30:11 AM PST
by
CholeraJoe
("At last my arm is complete!" Sweeney Todd)
To: Borges
I predict she will be a lifetime activist, darting from one issue to the next. She’ll never hold a job, and will never create wealth (for her or others).
18
posted on
01/10/2008 11:32:17 AM PST
by
GreenAccord
(Bacon Akbar!)
To: sappy
I bet she’ll go to work for some non-profit to “raise awareness” about some issue she’s “passionate” about.
19
posted on
01/10/2008 11:32:18 AM PST
by
MrB
(You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
To: Borges
Someone should inform Miss Sherman that she doesn't have any rights in this country. Now follow my logic which is just convuluted and contorted as hers:
Our rights are all God-given. She doesn't believe in God, so she can't accept any God-given rights.
so, Miss Sherman, shut up and sit down and do your homework.
20
posted on
01/10/2008 11:32:48 AM PST
by
Tanniker Smith
(Free Republic: You get the best of Both worlds -- Republican and Conservative)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-67 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson