Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Calpernia
I'd guess it's because they cannot isolate the fraudulent votes from valid ones with certainty, nor can you determine which candidates had what volume of such votes. For all we know every fraudulent vote was cast for Hillary, or for Hunter. So tey likely decided to stick to the original rules for the profferred invitations.

And no, I haven't a copy of the list of rules they are using to extend invitations to candidates. I'm just guessing.

100 posted on 01/10/2008 1:34:25 PM PST by theDentist (Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]


To: theDentist

>>>I’d guess it’s because they cannot isolate the fraudulent votes from valid ones with certainty, nor can you determine which candidates had what volume of such votes.

That is exactly my point. Makes it a very iffy criteria.


101 posted on 01/10/2008 1:57:17 PM PST by Calpernia (Hunters Rangers - Raising the Bar of Integrity http://www.barofintegrity.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson