The polls were proven to be off by 7 to 15 points. There’s no way they can claim their margin of error was 2-3%. Their polling data was used to exclude Hunter from the debates prior to New Hampshire, and then Hunter did poorly. The MSM DIRECTLY affected the process rather than reported on it. It was a self-fulfilling prophecy.
If you add that to Hunter’s polls, he gets into the debate, wins it like he won the last one, and takes his momentum into Nevada (where he has the endorsement of Nevada GOP somthin-or-other) and smokes South Carolina where he basically tied tootyfruityrudy in the Spartanburg straw poll. But instead, we have the MSM excluding this candidate on the basis of polls that are conducted by the MSM and the polls are proven WRONG. But that doesn’t stop them, they proceed anyways, even though there are ACTUAL delegates to Hunter’s name at the time of New Hampshire and Tootyfruityrudy had NONE.
You can’t say that this part of the puddle is fine, that other part is the one that’s poisoned. Not in this republic. Not if you’re a conservative. But you can say it if you’re a partisan. Thanks for exposing your agenda.
No, they weren't. I showed you how accurate the poll I cited was.
You can’t say that this part of the puddle is fine, that other part is the one that’s poisoned. Not in this republic. Not if you’re a conservative. But you can say it if you’re a partisan. Thanks for exposing your agenda.
I don't care about the accuracy of polls of Democrats. That has nothing to do with the accuracy of polls of Republican voters. If you want to get reliable info about GOP candidates running for the nomination, then look at the poll released that I cited. They are reliable. The polls were completely accurate in predicting Hunter's performance on Election Day. Deal with it or stay in denial. I don't care.