Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kevmo
The polls were proven to be off by 7 to 15 points. There’s no way they can claim their margin of error was 2-3%.

No, they weren't. I showed you how accurate the poll I cited was.

You can’t say that this part of the puddle is fine, that other part is the one that’s poisoned. Not in this republic. Not if you’re a conservative. But you can say it if you’re a partisan. Thanks for exposing your agenda.

I don't care about the accuracy of polls of Democrats. That has nothing to do with the accuracy of polls of Republican voters. If you want to get reliable info about GOP candidates running for the nomination, then look at the poll released that I cited. They are reliable. The polls were completely accurate in predicting Hunter's performance on Election Day. Deal with it or stay in denial. I don't care.

177 posted on 01/10/2008 4:45:41 PM PST by GraniteStateConservative (...He had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here...-- Worst.President.Ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies ]


To: GraniteStateConservative

No, they weren’t. I showed you how accurate the poll I cited was.
***You conveniently overlooked the EFFECT the MSM/Poll machine had on the race before, and how they directly changed the result. You don’t know that if Hunter had been in the 2 debates, directly after winning the last Iowa debate and being 1 of only 3 candidates with delegates to his name, having momentum from Wyoming, he would have done reasonably well. You don’t know that, and your GOP polls are poisoned water because they draw from the same well as the democrat polls that were off by more than 3-4 times the margin of error.


193 posted on 01/10/2008 6:26:47 PM PST by Kevmo (Duncan Hunter won't "let some arrogant corporate media executive decide whether this campaign's over)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies ]

To: GraniteStateConservative

I don’t care about the accuracy of polls of Democrats.
***It’s the SAME POLL. If it’s WRONG, it’s WRONG, and shouldn’t be used for determining anything representative in our democracy. Only partisans can’t see that.

That has nothing to do with the accuracy of polls of Republican voters.
***It’s the same Poll. It’s PROVEN WRONG.

If you want to get reliable info about GOP candidates running for the nomination, then look at the poll released that I cited. They are reliable.
***They are PROVEN UNRELIABLE. They were used to knock out results from ACTUAL VOTERS. What kind of a POS doesn’t understand that? The kind that, as you say so eloquently, “doesn’t care”. You don’t care about this republic. You’re no conservative.

The polls were completely accurate in predicting Hunter’s performance on Election Day. Deal with it or stay in denial. I don’t care.
***Polls that are wrong for one thing are wrong to be using for the electoral process. Period. The reason why you don’t want to see this is because your candidate got in, but it proves that you are no conservative. Such a thing should not be happening in this republic. Not if you’re a conservative. But you can say it if you’re a partisan. Thanks again for exposing your agenda.


194 posted on 01/10/2008 6:32:42 PM PST by Kevmo (Duncan Hunter won't "let some arrogant corporate media executive decide whether this campaign's over)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson