When are you Mittbots going to get an explanation on this issue ? This Mittbot is still waiting for your reply.
If/when Thompson drops out after SC, and we are left with Rudy, Huck and McCain, which is better than Romney?
_________________________________________________________
Do you agree with Romney and his gun banning proclivities ?
Romney as POTUS would not be trying to ban any guns.
And even if I did think him a gun-grabbing threat, it hardly matters. My gun rights are not safer with RINO's McCain, Huck or Giuliani. What about Thompson you say? Thompson got 1% in NH. Yeah, he didn't campaign there, but 1% he should get for merely existing. He is going all out in SC, and is barely in double digits there. Romney was the choice of NH conservatives, and he still gets the highest product when you multiply [conservative] x [viability].
Thompson is likely to drop out after SC, and endorse McCain. If Romney were to do what you want and drop out, that would then give us the suicide watch choice of Giuliani, Huckabee and McCain. Is that what you want?
That’s odd for them, their 2nd “issue” that says he “reiterated”, is actually a “reiteration” from 1994. They usually get that stuff updated when there’s newer material, which in this case there is.
Romney supports instant check, and no longer supports a waiting period (which he supported to ensure that guns were not purchased by people with criminal records).
And while he still supports in theory the banning of a limited number of weapons, he will not support any new bans unless some new gun appears that is worse than anything that is currently legal.
That’s not a perfect position, but it’s hardly a major assault on the rights of people to own guns. Even if he does ban the purchase of a new weapon, the AWBs he has supported never took a gun away, merely prevented new purchases.
His web site is pretty clear, and he’s made some recent statements which have been quoted by me and others here.
So it seems we need to educate you on his explanation.