Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iraqis Realize They Need Coalition to Stay, Odierno Says
American Forces Press Service ^ | Jim Garamone

Posted on 01/09/2008 3:31:15 PM PST by SandRat

WASHINGTON, Jan. 9, 2008 – Coalition servicemembers are making a difference in Iraq, and despite political rhetoric there, the country’s leaders realize they need coalition forces to remain, the commander of coalition ground forces said yesterday.

Army Lt. Gen. Raymond T. Odierno, commander of Multinational Corps Iraq, said that when he visits battalions and companies throughout Iraq, he is struck by the way Iraqis deal with coalition forces.

“It’s a very interesting dynamic,” the general said during a conference call with military analysts from his headquarters in Baghdad. “I go out about five times a week, … and it’s clear the Iraqis’ relationships with coalition forces is extremely strong.”

As part of the surge strategy, coalition units moved into the neighborhoods. Coalition forces, in partnership with Iraqi soldiers and police, set up joint security stations or combat outposts in neighborhoods throughout Baghdad and in villages and cities throughout Iraq. The U.S. and Iraqi forces eat, live and patrol together. These forces meet the people day after day, and the population gets to know the Americans.

“When I go out on a patrol, the Iraqis will start asking about folks who aren’t with us,” Odierno said. “They’ll ask ‘Where’s Sergeant Z today?’ And they actually ask why that person isn’t out. So the relationships are building.”

On the streets, the people see the security that coalition forces have helped bring to the neighborhoods, he said. That security allows public works projects to move forward, shops to reopen and markets to stock food and sundries. It allows children to go to school and parents to earn a living. It allows the people to walk about the streets without fear.

At the national level, the political rhetoric is different, Odierno said.

“Some Iraqi leaders are saying, ‘We really don’t need coalition forces, we only need them for a bit longer, we really want to take (the security mission) over,’” he said.

The idea of doing the mission on their own is right, Odierno acknowledged, but he added that even those Iraqi officials most insistent that the coalition leave are not saying they should leave right now.

“They all realize they want us to stay here a while longer,” the general said. “They believe in order for them to continue to progress, the coalition forces need to be here for a period of time longer.”

Most Iraqis want the coalition to reduce its forces as conditions dictate, he said. “They feel they need a few more years -- three to five years, in my opinion -- of some level of commitment here by coalition forces in order for them to work through their problems and be ready to move forward on their own,” he explained.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: coalition; frwn; iraq; stay; yankeesstayhere

1 posted on 01/09/2008 3:31:17 PM PST by SandRat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 91B; HiJinx; Spiff; MJY1288; xzins; Calpernia; clintonh8r; TEXOKIE; windchime; Grampa Dave; ...
FR WAR NEWS!
If you would like to be added to / removed from FRWN,
please FReepmail Sandrat.

WARNING: FRWN can be an EXTREMELY HIGH-VOLUME PING LIST!!

2 posted on 01/09/2008 3:31:36 PM PST by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

Thanks for the post.

IMO, forces will begin to seriously draw down by the end of this year. We’ll see.


3 posted on 01/09/2008 3:39:33 PM PST by DoughtyOne (< fence >< sound immigration policies >< /weasles >< /RINOs >< /Reagan wannabees that are liberal >)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
Convincing the Iraqis never was the big problem.
4 posted on 01/09/2008 4:52:19 PM PST by Salman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salman

5 posted on 01/09/2008 4:54:59 PM PST by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

SecDef says target is 10 combat Bdes by end-year situation permitting.
Currently it is 19. By July it is to be 15.

I do not think they will make 10 but 12 is probable.
Problem is MND-N and MND-C have some more housecleaning to wrap up.

Also watch the support troops get trimmed as the IA support quadruples by July. If they are supporting their own 13 Divs, then we will not need to...


6 posted on 01/09/2008 7:52:29 PM PST by DJ Elliott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DJ Elliott

Thanks for the informative response. Sounds very good.


7 posted on 01/10/2008 10:31:01 AM PST by DoughtyOne (< fence >< sound immigration policies >< /weasles >< /RINOs >< /Reagan wannabees that are liberal >)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

Of note: They are shifting the Bde HQ for the convoy security mission from Nasariyah to Kuwait. Gen P has said that they were reviewing support troop needs. The troop count will probably reduce more than the combat brigade count as they reduce the fobbit component as a percentage.


8 posted on 01/10/2008 11:21:23 AM PST by DJ Elliott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: DJ Elliott

That sounds quite positive also. Thank you.


9 posted on 01/10/2008 11:27:31 AM PST by DoughtyOne (< fence >< sound immigration policies >< /weasles >< /RINOs >< /Reagan wannabees that are liberal >)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson