Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: beaversmom
I'm gonna go with good on a few issues

Yup...and the WOT is one of those in a major way.

The image of Hillary as Commander in Chief standing and speaking before our armed forces as "Hail to the Chief" is played in her honor...EGADS.

I would crawl over broken glass and vote for ANY GOP candidate to avoid such a horror.

69 posted on 01/09/2008 12:29:56 AM PST by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]


To: what's up
I'm gonna go with good on a few issues

Yup...and the WOT is one of those in a major way.

Sure is.  And as far as it goes in Iraq, Afghanistan and the region, I'm with you.  Now, what about our nation.  Are you aware that a significant portion of the 09/11 hijackers were from Saudi Arabia?  Did you know that the Bush administration has allowed upwards of 70,000 education visas to Saudi nationals at this very moment?

Why is it that you and your family can't get on an airliner in the United States without being scanned, taking off your shoes and being strip searched if the minimum wage airport authority staff didn't get a good night's sleep?  Could it be because our President has simply refused to protect this nation from potentional terrorists from outside our nation?  Could it be because he is allowing our nation to be overrun by God knows how many people from south of our border?  Could it be because many of those people are criminals intent on preying on U.S. Citizens, and our President doesn't give a flying fig?

I've gotten to the place where I avoid flying if at all possible.  Is that the nation we want to live in?  Evidently so, because once again we are poised to vote in another diehard liberal from the left, or a guy who hasn't a clue when it comes to the other 75% of the spectrum that he should be well versed on.

The image of Hillary as Commander in Chief standing and speaking before our armed forces as "Hail to the Chief" is played in her honor...EGADS.

Yes, and while you're at it remember that the current president is the one who signed an order to destroy something like 75% of our nuclear arsenal after it had already been slashed during previous administrations.

I would crawl over broken glass and vote for ANY GOP candidate to avoid such a horror.

And while you're doing it, just remember that due to failed policies, you'll be crawling over that glass to vote in someone who will take more of your civil liberties away the very moment after the next terrorist attack perpetrated by those the current shmuck let come into our nation.

You folks may think we're unrealistic.  Frankly, I think you folks are ignoring an awful lot when you state that you'll vote for anyone just because they refuse to re-register in the party that supports the majority of their agenda.

93 posted on 01/09/2008 12:46:36 AM PST by DoughtyOne (< fence >< sound immigration policies >< /weasles >< /RINOs >< /Reagan wannabees that are liberal >)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

To: what's up
"Yup...and the WOT is one of those in a major way.

The image of Hillary as Commander in Chief standing and speaking before our armed forces as "Hail to the Chief" is played in her honor...EGADS.

I would crawl over broken glass and vote for ANY GOP candidate to avoid such a horror.
"

But Hillary's policy would likely involve buying more time for Iran to build and proliferate nukes--same policy that's likely to come from any of the candidates prevailing so far in both parties. Such policy will buy time for our enemies, allowing them to continue their buildups and to determine when and where the next war starts. Then Hillary would have to prove how much of a man she is, you know.

...which could lead to an American draft such as never seen before (millions)...and nuclear exchanges!

Excuse me. I've one of those "warmongering" "neo-cons" and am getting rather...excited and aroused. I need to take a break here.

;-)

BTW, if you want to deprive me of my ultimate thrill (war of all wars), support Duncan Hunter. He's the candidate most likely to be able to prevent the next War and keep it from getting started. But if you'd rather, any of the enemy-appeasing/free-traitoring front-runners will be just fine for my near-future fantasies! ;-)
117 posted on 01/09/2008 1:29:23 AM PST by familyop (cbt. engr. (cbt.)--has-been, Duncan Hunter supporter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson