I don't mince words. I report the facts. There are all kinds of threads on this forum that can be considered disparaging of one individual or another. That context is in the eye of the beholder.
You view it as disparaging because you support Paul. I view it as information that is critical toward understanding a political opportunist.
If you don't like the material that's posted on this forum you have an option. I don't believe I need to tell you what that is.
Wrong. I'll defend anyone whose name is unfairly associated with racism. The tactics whereby this attempt was made are better suited to the DBM's thuggish rhetoric. Fine with me if you want to support and indulge such tactics (guilt by false association as a legitimate talking point), but I would have thought better of you, since you seem to be the expert in what constitutes legitimate debate.