Replies

Marie to Gloria:

Voting for a candidate based solely on their gender is no different than voting against them for the same reason (id est: sexist).

9 posted on 01/08/2008 6:29:27 AM PST by LIConFem (Thompson. Lifetime ACU Rating: 86 -- Hunter Lifetime ACU Rating: 92 (any combo will do, fellas))

I wonder - do feminists use the same twisted logic that race baters do?

That women cannot be sexist because “they lack the power to impose their sexism”?

16 posted on 01/08/2008 6:30:57 AM PST by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)

Voting for a candidate based solely on their gender is no different than voting against them for the same reason

Absolutely. My sensitive feelings are still hurt that the ultimate authority on race relations, Don Imus called ALL the people of my state 'abject racists' because we didn't elect Harold Ford Jr.

How is voting for someone because of their skin color any different than voting against someone because of their skin color? What happened to "by the content of their character"?

Hey Don.. Hey Gloria.. YOUR BIASES ARE SHOWING. You are the worst kind of racists and sexists.

Give me the best PERSON for the job.. genitalia and melanin are not factors for me.

64 posted on 01/08/2008 7:09:45 AM PST by LimaLimaMikeFoxtrot ("If you don't have my army supplied, and keep it supplied, we'll eat your mules up, sir"-Gen.Sherman)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794