Preachin: but he’s simply NOT going to come close to winning.
Kevmo: And that aligns with Christian evangelical values exactly how?
Preachin: I have read it, and preached it many times. I hear the talk, but where exactly is Hunter in the mix? Overall he is my favorite, but he ain’t gonna win.
***That does not answer the question. It aligns with the values because...
Not to be offensive, but I’ll go toe-to-toe with anyone on the scriptures.
***Then answer the question. I like what you say about Gideon, so you get it. But you’re avoiding the question. There’s usually a reason why people avoid questions.
In the absence of a suitable response, what the Huckabee supporters will note is that they will not feel very comfortable in Team Fred, because Fred is not an evangelical. Hunter is. Hunter is a very conservative, pro-life evangelical, more pro-life than Thompson. Team Thompson needs to twist itself into a pretzel to attract evangelical support, whereas Team Hunter just says, “check out our candidate, he’s the best.”
No I am not. You are comparing apples and oranges. The Lord used Gideon and his 300 men to defeat an army.
How on earth do you suspect that the Lord can use 300 people to win the presidency?
Let’s see... 300 votes against millions. There is a difference between winning a physical war, and winning the election, and you need to get with reality. One needs real votes to win an election, and not some verses about Gideon that are taken out of their context. In the end, a candidate still needs to win the electoral college, and that 1% of the caucus and primary votes doesn’t do it, no matter what verses you quote.
Once again, I like Hunter, but I like Thompson, too. I will vote for Fred in the GA primary. However, my vote and 299 other people won’t get him the nomination.
I have avoided no questions. You have avoided reality, and need to let it sink in.